Suppr超能文献

口服依诺昔酮治疗对最佳治疗无效的终末期充血性心力衰竭的安慰剂对照试验。

Placebo-controlled trial of oral enoximone in end-stage congestive heart failure refractory to optimal treatment.

作者信息

Dubourg O, Delorme G, Hardy A, Beauchet A, Tarral A, Bourdarias J P

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Ouest, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne, France.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 1990 Jul;28 Suppl 1:S33-42; discussion S43. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(90)90149-y.

Abstract

A double-blind, randomized, concurrent trial of enoximone vs placebo was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of enoximone, 100 mg t.d.s. added to optimal therapy in 30 patients (mean age, 66.4 +/- 14 years) with severe congestive heart failure. Before inclusion, all patients remained markedly symptomatic despite treatment with diuretics, digitalis, vasodilators and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Symptoms and quality of life were evaluated at inclusion, and at days 4 and 31; 24-hour electrocardiography and Doppler echocardiography were performed at inclusion and at day 31. Clinical and echocardiographic baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. During the study, 10 patients dropped out: 3 in the enoximone group (1 death) and 7 in the placebo group (3 deaths). At day 4, symptoms were improved in 13 enoximone-treated patients and in 8 patients on placebo (P less than 0.05). At day 31, symptoms were still improving in 10 of 12 patients on enoximone and in 6 of 8 patients on placebo (NS). No serious clinical side-effects were reported, and no statistically significant difference in the frequency of premature ventricular contractions between the two groups was apparent on Holter monitoring. Peak acceleration of ascending aortic blood flow at entry was 17 +/- 6 m/second2 in the enoximone group and 18 +/- 5 m/second2 in the placebo group (NS). At day 31, the change in peak acceleration was +20% in the enoximone group vs -6% in the placebo group (P less than 0.05). Cardiac index increased by 18% in the enoximone group (from 2.17 +/- 0.7 litres/minute/m2 to 2.4 +/- 1.0 litres/minute/m2 (NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

进行了一项依诺昔酮与安慰剂的双盲、随机、同期试验,以评估在30例(平均年龄66.4±14岁)重度充血性心力衰竭患者中,在最佳治疗基础上加用每日三次、每次100毫克依诺昔酮的疗效和安全性。入选前,尽管使用了利尿剂、洋地黄、血管扩张剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂,所有患者仍有明显症状。在入选时、第4天和第31天评估症状和生活质量;在入选时和第31天进行24小时心电图检查和多普勒超声心动图检查。两组的临床和超声心动图基线特征相似。研究期间,10例患者退出:依诺昔酮组3例(1例死亡),安慰剂组7例(3例死亡)。在第4天,13例接受依诺昔酮治疗的患者和8例接受安慰剂治疗的患者症状改善(P<0.05)。在第31天,12例接受依诺昔酮治疗的患者中有10例症状仍在改善,8例接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有6例症状仍在改善(无显著性差异)。未报告严重临床副作用,动态心电图监测显示两组室性早搏频率无统计学显著差异。入选时依诺昔酮组升主动脉血流峰值加速度为17±6米/秒²,安慰剂组为18±5米/秒²(无显著性差异)。在第31天,依诺昔酮组峰值加速度变化为+20%,而安慰剂组为-6%(P<0.05)。依诺昔酮组心脏指数增加了18%(从2.17±0.7升/分钟/平方米增至2.4±1.0升/分钟/平方米)(无显著性差异)。(摘要截短于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验