Yesilyurt Ozgur, Dogrul Ahmet, Gul Husamettin, Seyrek Melik, Kusmez Ozkan, Ozkan Yalcin, Yildiz Oguzhan
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, 06018 Etlik, Ankara, Turkey.
Pain. 2003 Sep;105(1-2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00245-8.
Opioids and cannabinoids produce antinociception through both spinal and supraspinal action. Both opioids and cannabinoids also have important peripheral action. Many previous studies indicate that systemically administered cannabinoids enhance antinociceptive properties of opioids. Experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that topical cannabinoids would enhance the topical antinociceptive effects of morphine. Antinociception was measured in the radiant tail-flick test after immersion of the tail of mice into a solution of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) containing WIN 55, 212-2, a cannabinoid agonist and morphine, an opioid agonist. Morphine and WIN 55, 212-2 produce time dependent topical analgesic effects limited to the portion of the tail exposed to drugs. WIN 55, 212-2 had a potency lower than that of morphine. The topical antinociceptive effects of WIN 55, 212-2 were blocked by systemic pretreatment of cannabinoid CB1 receptor selective antagonist, AM 251. This suggests that topical antinociceptive effects of WIN 55, 212-2 involve CB1 receptors. Combination of topical WIN 55, 212-2 with topical morphine yielded significantly greater analgesic effects than that of topical morphine alone. The ability of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM 251 to antagonize the enhancement of antinociception of morphine by WIN 55, 212-2 indicates that WIN 55, 212-2 acts through a CB1 receptor to enhance the potency of topical morphine. Additionally, spinally administered ineffective doses of WIN 55, 212-2 potentiated the antinociceptive effects of topical morphine. These results demonstrate an antinociceptive interaction between topical opioids with topical, and spinal cannabinoids. These observations are significant in using of topical combination of cannabinoid and morphine in the management of pain.
阿片类药物和大麻素通过脊髓和脊髓上的作用产生抗伤害感受。阿片类药物和大麻素也都具有重要的外周作用。许多先前的研究表明,全身给药的大麻素可增强阿片类药物的抗伤害感受特性。进行了实验以检验局部应用大麻素会增强吗啡局部抗伤害感受作用这一假设。将小鼠尾巴浸入含有大麻素激动剂WIN 55,212-2和阿片类激动剂吗啡的二甲基亚砜(DMSO)溶液中后,通过辐射甩尾试验测量抗伤害感受。吗啡和WIN 55,212-2产生时间依赖性的局部镇痛作用,且仅限于暴露于药物的尾巴部分。WIN 55,212-2的效力低于吗啡。大麻素CB1受体选择性拮抗剂AM 251的全身预处理可阻断WIN 55,212-2的局部抗伤害感受作用。这表明WIN 55,212-2的局部抗伤害感受作用涉及CB1受体。局部应用WIN 55,212-2与局部应用吗啡联合使用产生的镇痛效果明显大于单独局部应用吗啡。CB1受体拮抗剂AM 251拮抗WIN 55,212-2增强吗啡抗伤害感受的能力表明,WIN 55,212-2通过CB1受体起作用以增强局部吗啡的效力。此外,脊髓给予无效剂量的WIN 55,212-2可增强局部吗啡的抗伤害感受作用。这些结果证明了局部阿片类药物与局部和脊髓大麻素之间存在抗伤害感受相互作用。这些观察结果对于大麻素和吗啡局部联合用于疼痛管理具有重要意义。