Suppr超能文献

大麻素类药物在镇痛方面的阿片类药物节约效应:临床前和临床研究的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。

Opioid-sparing effect of cannabinoids for analgesia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies.

机构信息

Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia.

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jun;47(7):1315-1330. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01322-4. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

Abstract

Cannabinoid co-administration may enable reduced opioid doses for analgesia. This updated systematic review on the opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids considered preclinical and clinical studies where the outcome was analgesia or opioid dose requirements. We searched Scopus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Embase (2016 onwards). Ninety-two studies met the search criteria including 15 ongoing trials. Meta-analysis of seven preclinical studies found the median effective dose (ED) of morphine administered with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol was 3.5 times lower (95% CI 2.04, 6.03) than the ED of morphine alone. Six preclinical studies found no evidence of increased opioid abuse liability with cannabinoid administration. Of five healthy-volunteer experimental pain studies, two found increased pain, two found decreased pain and one found reduced pain bothersomeness with cannabinoid administration; three demonstrated that cannabinoid co-administration may increase opioid abuse liability. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found no evidence of opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids in acute pain. Meta-analysis of four RCTs in patients with cancer pain found no effect of cannabinoid administration on opioid dose (mean difference -3.8 mg, 95% CI -10.97, 3.37) or percentage change in pain scores (mean difference 1.84, 95% CI -2.05, 5.72); five studies found more adverse events with cannabinoids compared with placebo (risk ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.03, 1.24). Of five controlled chronic non-cancer pain trials; one low-quality study with no control arm, and one single-dose study reported reduced pain scores with cannabinoids. Three RCTs found no treatment effect of dronabinol. Meta-analyses of observational studies found 39% reported opioid cessation (95% CI 0.15, 0.64, I 95.5%, eight studies), and 85% reported reduction (95% CI 0.64, 0.99, I 92.8%, seven studies). In summary, preclinical and observational studies demonstrate the potential opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids in the context of analgesia, in contrast to higher-quality RCTs that did not provide evidence of opioid-sparing effects.

摘要

大麻素联合应用可能减少阿片类药物的用量以达到镇痛效果。本系统评价更新了大麻素类药物的阿片类药物节约作用,纳入了以镇痛或阿片类药物需求为结局的临床前和临床研究。我们检索了 Scopus、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Medline 和 Embase(2016 年以后)。92 项研究符合检索标准,其中包括 15 项正在进行的试验。7 项临床前研究的荟萃分析发现,与单独使用吗啡相比,给予大麻二酚时吗啡的中效剂量(ED)低 3.5 倍(95%CI 2.04,6.03)。6 项临床前研究发现,给予大麻素后,阿片类药物滥用的可能性没有增加。5 项健康志愿者实验性疼痛研究中有 2 项发现疼痛增加,2 项发现疼痛减轻,1 项发现疼痛困扰减轻;3 项研究表明,大麻素联合应用可能增加阿片类药物滥用的可能性。3 项随机对照试验(RCT)未发现大麻素对急性疼痛有节省阿片类药物的作用。4 项癌症疼痛患者 RCT 的荟萃分析发现,给予大麻素对阿片类药物剂量(平均差值-3.8mg,95%CI-10.97,3.37)或疼痛评分的百分比变化(平均差值 1.84,95%CI-2.05,5.72)没有影响;5 项研究发现大麻素比安慰剂有更多的不良反应(风险比 1.13,95%CI 1.03,1.24)。5 项对照慢性非癌性疼痛试验中,1 项低质量研究没有对照组,1 项单剂量研究报告大麻素可减轻疼痛评分。3 项 RCT 发现 dronabinol 无治疗效果。观察性研究的荟萃分析发现,39%(95%CI 0.15,0.64,I 95.5%,8 项研究)报告阿片类药物停药,85%(95%CI 0.64,0.99,I 92.8%,7 项研究)报告阿片类药物用量减少。总之,临床前和观察性研究表明,在镇痛的情况下,大麻素具有潜在的节省阿片类药物的作用,而高质量的 RCT 则没有提供节省阿片类药物作用的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/260e/9117273/d3cca3a18c0c/41386_2022_1322_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验