Avlonitis Vassilios S, Krause Anna, Luzzi Luca, Powell Hazel, Phillips Julie A, Corris Paul A, Gould F Kate, Dark John H
Cardiopulmonary Transplantation Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Oct;24(4):601-7. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00454-8.
At the time of lung transplant, we routinely perform bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of the donor lungs on the recipient operating table immediately before implantation, for bacterial and fungal cultures. We sought to determine whether the results correlate with the outcome.
We retrospectively analysed 115 consecutive cadaveric lung transplants (single lung: 42; bilateral lung: 63; heart-lung: 10) performed over 4 years.
Fifty-three (46%) grafts had positive BAL (bacteria: 33; fungus: 10; mixed: 10) and 62 (54%) were negative. Recipients with donor BAL culture positive for bacteria had lower mean oxygenation index in the first 6 h compared with those with negative bacterial culture (36.5+/-14.73 vs. 44.1+/-16.79 kPa) (P=0.019). They also had longer median intensive treatment unit stay (2.5 vs. 1.5 days) (P=0.035), and median time of mechanical ventilation (37.5 vs. 23.0 h) (P=0.008), as well as inferior 6-month, 1-year, 2-year and 4-year cumulative survival (79, 77, 74, 60% vs. 93, 92, 88, 79% respectively) (P=0.04). There was no difference in the above parameters between recipients with Gram-negative (n=18) and recipients with Gram-positive bacteria (n=19) in the donor BAL. Incidence of acute rejection within the first 2 weeks and time of onset of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) were similar in the bacteria-positive and bacteria-negative groups. Recipients with donor BAL positive for fungi alone had similar outcome with the negatives. There was no difference in the donor oxygenation index and age, recipient age, transplant type and ischaemic time between compared groups. There was a significant difference in the median length of donor mechanical ventilation between donors with Gram-positive and donors with Gram-negative bacteria in the BAL (24 vs. 48 h) (P=0.01), as well as between donors with fungi alone in the BAL and donors with negative BAL (67 vs. 48 h) (P=0.04).
Donor lungs with lower airways colonized with bacteria result in inferior recipient outcome. Bacterial colonization of the donor lower airways could therefore be used as a marker of donor lung injury, but evidence from a prospective study is necessary.
在肺移植时,我们通常在植入前立即在受者手术台上对供体肺进行支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL),以进行细菌和真菌培养。我们试图确定这些结果是否与预后相关。
我们回顾性分析了4年期间连续进行的115例尸体肺移植(单肺:42例;双肺:63例;心肺联合移植:10例)。
53例(46%)移植物BAL结果为阳性(细菌:33例;真菌:10例;混合菌:10例),62例(54%)为阴性。供体BAL细菌培养阳性的受者在最初6小时内的平均氧合指数低于细菌培养阴性的受者(36.5±14.73 vs. 44.1±16.79 kPa)(P=0.019)。他们的重症监护病房中位住院时间也更长(2.5天对1.5天)(P=0.035),机械通气中位时间更长(37.5小时对23.0小时)(P=0.008),6个月、1年、2年和4年的累积生存率也更低(分别为79%、77%、74%、60%对93%、92%、88%、79%)(P=0.04)。供体BAL中革兰阴性菌(n=18)的受者与革兰阳性菌(n=19)的受者在上述参数上没有差异。细菌阳性组和细菌阴性组在前2周内急性排斥反应的发生率和闭塞性细支气管炎综合征(BOS)的发病时间相似。仅供体BAL真菌阳性的受者与阴性受者的预后相似。比较组之间的供体氧合指数、年龄、受者年龄、移植类型和缺血时间没有差异。BAL中革兰阳性菌供体与革兰阴性菌供体的供体机械通气中位时间有显著差异(24小时对48小时)(P=0.01),BAL中仅真菌阳性供体与BAL阴性供体的供体机械通气中位时间也有显著差异(67小时对48小时)(P=0.04)。
下呼吸道有细菌定植的供体肺会导致受者预后较差。因此,供体下呼吸道细菌定植可作为供体肺损伤的一个指标,但需要前瞻性研究的证据。