Michelassi Fabrizio, Lee John, Rubin Michele, Fichera Alessandro, Kasza Kristen, Karrison Theodore, Hurst Roger D
Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue (MC 5094), Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Ann Surg. 2003 Sep;238(3):433-41; discussion 442-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000086658.60555.ea.
To document functional results in patients treated with an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA).
The restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA has become the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis, yet the long-term functional results are not well known.
We performed this prospective observational study in 391 consecutive patients (56% male; mean age, 33.7 +/- 10.8 years; range, 12-66 years) who underwent an IPAA between 1987 and 2002 (mean follow-up, 33.6 months; range, 0 to 180 months).
The majority of patients underwent the procedure under elective circumstances with a hand-sewn ileal pouch anal anastomosis and a protective ileostomy. In 25 patients (6.4%), the procedure was performed under urgent conditions; in 137 patients (35%), the temporary ileostomy was omitted; in 117 patients (29.9%), the ileal pouch anal anastomosis was stapled. There was 1 hospital mortality (0.25%) and 1 30-day mortality. Mean length of stay was 9.2 +/- 5.6 days (3-68 days; median, 8 days) and was increased by the occurrence of septic complications (8.9 versus 13.6 days; P < 0.02) and by the omission of a temporary ileostomy (8.3 versus 10.4 days; P = 0.005). Complications included pelvic abscess (1.3%), anastomotic dehiscence (6.4%), bowel obstruction (11.7%), and anastomotic stenosis in need of mechanical dilatation (10.7%). Patients were asked to record their functional results on a questionnaire for 1 week at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after the IPAA and yearly thereafter. Our data to 10 years show that median number of bowel movements (bms) was 6 bm/24 hours at all time intervals. The average number of bms increased by 0.3 bm/decade of life (P < 0.001). Throughout the entire follow-up, more than 75% of patients had at least 1 bm most nights, although fewer than 40% found it necessary to alter the time of their meals to avoid bms at inappropriate times. Depending on the time interval, between 57% and 78% of patients were always able to postpone a bm until convenient, and this ability was similar in patients with a stapled or hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis; only up to 18% were able to always distinguish between flatus and stools, and this ability was similar in patients with a stapled or hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis. Complete daytime and nighttime continence was achieved by 53-76% of patients depending on the time interval. The percentage of fully continent patients was higher following the stapled rather than the hand-sewn technique (P < 0.001), and this difference persisted over time. When patients experienced incontinence, its occurrence ameliorated over time (P < 0.001), and the occurrence of perianal rash and itching as well as the use of protective pads decreased over time (P < 0.008). At 5 years, patients judged quality of life as much better or better in 81.4% and overall satisfaction and overall adjustment as excellent or good in 96.3% and 97.5%, respectively.
We conclude that the IPAA confers a good quality of life. The majority of patients are fully continent, have 6 bms/d on average, and can defer a bm until convenient. When present, incontinence improves over time.
记录接受回肠储袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)患者的功能结果。
IPAA恢复性直肠结肠切除术已成为溃疡性结肠炎患者的首选手术方式,但长期功能结果尚不明确。
我们对1987年至2002年间连续接受IPAA的391例患者(男性占56%;平均年龄33.7±10.8岁;范围12 - 66岁)进行了这项前瞻性观察研究(平均随访33.6个月;范围0至180个月)。
大多数患者在择期情况下接受手术,采用手工缝合回肠储袋肛管吻合术并做保护性回肠造口术。25例患者(6.4%)在紧急情况下接受手术;137例患者(35%)未做临时回肠造口术;117例患者(29.9%)采用吻合器进行回肠储袋肛管吻合术。有1例医院死亡(0.25%)和1例30天内死亡。平均住院时间为9.2±5.6天(3 - 68天;中位数8天),因发生感染性并发症(8.9天对13.6天;P < 0.02)及未做临时回肠造口术(8.3天对10.4天;P = 0.005)而延长。并发症包括盆腔脓肿(1.3%)、吻合口裂开(6.4%)、肠梗阻(11.7%)以及需要机械扩张的吻合口狭窄(10.7%)。要求患者在IPAA术后3、6、9、12、18和24个月以及此后每年填写一份问卷记录其1周内的功能结果。我们10年的数据显示,在所有时间间隔内,排便次数中位数均为每24小时6次。排便次数平均每10年增加0.3次(P < 0.001)。在整个随访期间,超过75%的患者大多数晚上至少排便1次,尽管不到4%认为有必要改变用餐时间以避免在不合适的时间排便。根据时间间隔,57%至78%的患者总能将排便推迟到方便的时候,吻合器或手工缝合回肠肛管吻合术患者的这种能力相似;只有高达18%的患者总能区分排气和排便,吻合器或手工缝合回肠肛管吻合术患者的这种能力相似。根据时间间隔,53%至76%的患者实现白天和夜间完全控便。采用吻合器技术的完全控便患者百分比高于手工缝合技术(P < 0.001),且这种差异随时间持续存在。当患者出现失禁时,随着时间推移其发生率降低(P < 0.001),肛周皮疹和瘙痒的发生率以及护垫的使用也随时间减少(P < 0.008)。5年时,81.4%的患者认为生活质量好得多或较好,96.3%和97.5%的患者分别对总体满意度和总体适应情况评价为优秀或良好。
我们得出结论,IPAA可带来良好的生活质量。大多数患者完全控便,平均每天排便6次,且能将排便推迟到方便的时候。若出现失禁,随着时间推移会有所改善。