Barrett-Connor Elizabeth, Wehren Lois E, Siris Ethel S, Miller Paul, Chen Ya-Ting, Abbott Thomas A, Berger Marc L, Santora Arthur C, Sherwood Louis M
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0607, USA.
Menopause. 2003 Sep-Oct;10(5):412-9. doi: 10.1097/01.GME.0000086467.82759.DA.
Results from the Women's Health Initiative showed that postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prevents fractures but has an overall unfavorable risk:benefit ratio, leading to the recommendation that HRT be used only for women with troublesome menopause symptoms, and for as short a time as possible. This recommendation has important implications for the timing and duration of HRT and the prevention of osteoporosis. The large number of women participating in the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) program provided the opportunity to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and 1-year fracture risk in analyses stratified by duration and recency of HRT.
Participants were 170,852 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 104, without known osteoporosis, who were recruited from primary physicians offices across the US. BMD was measured at one of four peripheral sites, and the 1-year risk of osteoporotic fracture was assessed by questionnaire.
At baseline, current HRT users had the highest T-scores at every age. Among current hormone users, women who had used HRT longest had the highest BMD levels. Women who had stopped HRT more than 5 years previously, regardless of duration of use, had T-scores similar to never-users. Current but not past hormone use at baseline was associated with a 25% to 29% lower risk of osteoporotic fracture (P < 0.0001) in 1 year, compared with nonusers. These findings were independent of age, ethnicity, body mass index, lifestyle, years postmenopausal, and site of BMD measurement.
We conclude that postmenopausal BMD and fracture are closely associated with current, but not prior, HRT use. Use of HRT for 5 years or less, as proposed for treatment of symptomatic women during menopause transition, is unlikely to preserve bone or significantly reduce fracture risk in later years.
妇女健康倡议的结果表明,绝经后激素替代疗法(HRT)可预防骨折,但总体风险效益比不佳,这导致建议仅将HRT用于有严重更年期症状的女性,并尽可能短期使用。该建议对HRT的使用时间和持续时间以及骨质疏松症的预防具有重要意义。大量参与国家骨质疏松症风险评估(NORA)项目的女性提供了在按HRT使用持续时间和近期情况分层的分析中评估骨密度(BMD)和1年骨折风险的机会。
参与者为170,852名年龄在50至104岁之间、无已知骨质疏松症的绝经后女性,她们是从美国各地的初级医生办公室招募的。在四个外周部位之一测量BMD,并通过问卷调查评估骨质疏松性骨折的1年风险。
在基线时,当前使用HRT的女性在每个年龄段的T值最高。在当前激素使用者中,使用HRT时间最长的女性BMD水平最高。停用HRT超过5年的女性,无论使用时间长短,其T值与从未使用者相似。与未使用者相比,基线时当前而非过去使用激素与1年内骨质疏松性骨折风险降低25%至29%相关(P<0.0001)。这些发现独立于年龄、种族、体重指数、生活方式、绝经后年限和BMD测量部位。
我们得出结论,绝经后BMD和骨折与当前而非既往使用HRT密切相关。如在更年期过渡期间对有症状女性所建议的那样,使用HRT 5年或更短时间不太可能保留骨骼或显著降低晚年骨折风险。