Miller Paul D, Siris Ethel S, Barrett-Connor Elizabeth, Faulkner Kenneth G, Wehren Lois E, Abbott Thomas A, Chen Ya-Ting, Berger Marc L, Santora Arthur C, Sherwood Louis M
Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, Colorado 80227, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Dec;17(12):2222-30. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2222.
Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for fracture. Although the current "gold standard" test is DXA of the hip and spine, this method is not universally available. No large studies have evaluated the ability of new, less expensive peripheral technologies to predict fracture. We studied the association between BMD measurements at peripheral sites and subsequent fracture risk at the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, and rib in 149,524 postmenopausal white women, without prior diagnosis of osteoporosis. At enrollment, each participant completed a risk assessment questionnaire and had BMD testing at the heel, forearm, or finger. Main outcomes were new fractures of the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, or rib within the first 12 months after testing. After 1 year, 2259 women reported 2340 new fractures. Based on manufacturers' normative data and multivariable adjusted analyses, women who had T scores < or = -2.5 SD were 2.15 (finger) to 3.94 (heel ultrasound [US]) times more likely to fracture than women with normal BMD. All measurement sites/devices predicted fracture equally well, and risk prediction was similar whether calculated from the manufacturers' young normal values (T scores) or using SDs from the mean age of the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) population. The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for hip fracture were comparable with those published using measurements at hip sites. We conclude that low BMD found by peripheral technologies, regardless of the site measured, is associated with at least a twofold increased risk of fracture within 1 year, even at skeletal sites other than the one measured.
低骨矿物质密度(BMD)是骨折的一个危险因素。尽管目前的“金标准”检测方法是髋部和脊柱的双能X线吸收法(DXA),但这种方法并非普遍可用。尚无大型研究评估新型、成本较低的外周技术预测骨折的能力。我们研究了149524名未预先诊断为骨质疏松症的绝经后白人女性外周部位骨密度测量值与随后髋部、腕部/前臂、脊柱和肋骨骨折风险之间的关联。在入组时,每位参与者完成了一份风险评估问卷,并在足跟、前臂或手指进行了骨密度检测。主要结局是检测后前12个月内髋部、腕部/前臂、脊柱或肋骨的新发骨折。1年后,2259名女性报告了2340例新发骨折。根据制造商的标准数据和多变量调整分析,T值≤ -2.5标准差的女性骨折可能性是骨密度正常女性的2.15倍(手指)至3.94倍(足跟超声[US])。所有测量部位/设备对骨折的预测效果相同,无论根据制造商的年轻正常值(T值)计算还是使用来自国家骨质疏松症风险评估(NORA)人群平均年龄的标准差进行计算,风险预测都相似。髋部骨折的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积与使用髋部部位测量值发表的结果相当。我们得出结论,外周技术检测到的低骨密度,无论测量部位如何,即使在测量部位以外的骨骼部位,也与1年内至少两倍的骨折风险增加相关。