McSherry Bernadette
Faculty of Law, PO Box 12, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(5):581-99. doi: 10.1002/bsl.552.
This article addresses how mental disorder may be used in common law countries to negate the requirements of voluntariness and intention in serious criminal offences as well as to provide the basis for current versions of the insanity defence. The notion that mental disorder can cause conduct to become completely involuntary or unintentional is questionable, given current thinking in the behavioral sciences. This article argues that different forms of mental disorder should be subsumed within a separate defence of mental disorder. Providing that a range of dispositional options is available, the law in this complex area would be simplified and brought into line with current psychological notions of goal-directed behavior.
本文探讨了在普通法国家,精神障碍如何被用于否定严重刑事犯罪中自愿性和意图的要求,以及为当前版本的精神错乱抗辩提供依据。鉴于行为科学的当前思维,认为精神障碍会导致行为完全非自愿或无意的观点是值得怀疑的。本文认为,不同形式的精神障碍应归入单独的精神障碍抗辩中。如果有一系列处置选项可供选择,那么这一复杂领域的法律将得到简化,并与当前关于目标导向行为的心理学概念保持一致。