Gielerak Grzegorz, Kozłowski Dariusz, Dłuzniewska Ewa, Roszczyk Anna, Cholewa Marian
Department of Internal Diseases and Cardiology, Central Military Hospital, Medical Academy, Warsaw, Poland.
Kardiol Pol. 2003 Feb;58(2):98-108.
A degree of reduction of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) values following beta-blocker administration has been shown to indicate beta-blockade effectiveness. Whether this parameter is also useful in the identification of patients with vaso-vagal syncope (VVS) who could benefit from beta-blocker therapy, has not yet been established.
To analyse the usefulness of propranolol-induced acute changes in HR and BP in the prediction of the results of tilt testing (TT) in patients with VVS.
The study group consisted of 37 patients with a history of at least two syncopal episodes in the past 6 months, in whom syncope was reproduced during TT. After positive baseline TT the patients were returned to supine position and were given intravenous propranolol. After 15 min supine rest the patients were tilted again using the same protocol as during the baseline test. Propranolol was considered effective when the result of the second (on drug) TT was negative or the time to syncope occurrence was longer than during baseline TT. During the whole procedure systolic BP (SBP), mean BP (MBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and HR were measured. These parameters were analysed in four different time-intervals: period I - between 13th and 15th minute of supine rest preceding the passive phase of TT, period II - between first and third minute of the passive TT, period III - following propranolol injection, between 13th and 15th minute of supine rest preceding second TT, and period IV - between first and third minute of second TT, either passive (if positive) or after NTG administration. Both, mean values and differences (Delta) in analysed parameters between various time-intervals (II-I, III-I, IV-II and IV-III) were taken into account.
Intravenous propranolol occurred effective in preventing syncope during second TT in 29/37 (78%) patients. The DeltaSBP, DeltaMBP and DeltaDBP values calculated from periods III and IV were significantly different between patients with or without protective effects of propranolol. The cut-off values which were computed to obtain the highest value of total predictive accuracy (the highest value of the sum of sensitivity and specificity) were -5 mmHg for DeltaSBP, -4 mmHg for DeltaMBP and -2 mmHg for DeltaDBP. A stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that DeltaSBP of -5 mmHg or less had the highest value in the prediction of a positive response to propranolol, reaching a sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 88%, positive predictive value of 95% and negative predictive value of 48%.
Propranolol-induced changes in blood pressure values may predict the effectiveness of beta-blockade in preventing syncope during second TT performed after intravenous infusion of propranolol. A drug-induced reduction in systolic blood pressure of less than 5 mmHg may identify those who will benefit from beta-blocker therapy.
已表明给予β受体阻滞剂后心率(HR)和血压(BP)值的一定程度降低可指示β受体阻滞的有效性。该参数在识别可能从β受体阻滞剂治疗中获益的血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)患者中是否也有用,尚未确定。
分析普萘洛尔引起的HR和BP急性变化在预测VVS患者倾斜试验(TT)结果中的有用性。
研究组由37例在过去6个月内有至少两次晕厥发作史且在TT期间再现晕厥的患者组成。在基线TT呈阳性后,患者恢复仰卧位并给予静脉注射普萘洛尔。仰卧休息15分钟后,使用与基线测试相同的方案再次使患者倾斜。当第二次(用药后)TT结果为阴性或晕厥发生时间长于基线TT时,普萘洛尔被认为有效。在整个过程中测量收缩压(SBP)、平均血压(MBP)、舒张压(DBP)和HR。在四个不同的时间间隔分析这些参数:时期I - 在TT被动阶段之前仰卧休息的第13至15分钟之间;时期II - 在被动TT的第一至三分钟之间;时期III - 注射普萘洛尔后,在第二次TT之前仰卧休息的第13至15分钟之间;时期IV - 在第二次TT的第一至三分钟之间,若为阳性则为被动阶段,或在给予硝酸甘油后。考虑了分析参数在不同时间间隔(II - I、III - I、IV - II和IV - III)之间的平均值和差值(Delta)。
静脉注射普萘洛尔在29/37(78%)的患者中有效预防了第二次TT期间的晕厥。普萘洛尔有或无保护作用的患者之间,根据时期III和IV计算的DeltaSBP、DeltaMBP和DeltaDBP值有显著差异。为获得总预测准确性的最高值(敏感性和特异性之和的最高值)而计算的临界值为:DeltaSBP为 - 5 mmHg,DeltaMBP为 - 4 mmHg,DeltaDBP为 - 2 mmHg。逐步逻辑回归分析显示,DeltaSBP为 - 5 mmHg或更低在预测对普萘洛尔的阳性反应中具有最高值,敏感性达到72%,特异性为88%,阳性预测值为95%,阴性预测值为48%。
普萘洛尔引起的血压值变化可预测静脉输注普萘洛尔后进行的第二次TT期间β受体阻滞预防晕厥的有效性。药物引起的收缩压降低小于mmHg可能识别出那些将从β受体阻滞剂治疗中获益的患者。