Cox M M, Perlman B A, Mayor M R, Silberstein T A, Levin E, Pringle L, Castellanos A, Myerburg R J
Division of Cardiology, University of Miami, School of Medicine, Florida 33101, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Nov 1;26(5):1293-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00320-7.
This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the long-term outcome of drug therapy guided by head-up tilt testing for the management of unexplained syncope and near syncope.
Head-up tilt testing is used to evaluate patients with unexplained syncope. The validity of acute drug testing and the efficacy of long-term oral therapy for prevention of recurrent syncope have not been investigated in large patient groups.
We studied 296 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope or near syncope who underwent 80 degrees head-up tilt testing with and without isoproterenol challenge. The efficacy of intravenous and oral beta-blocker therapy was evaluated by repeat testing. Patients with both positive and negative responses to therapy were followed up for rates of recurrence of syncope.
A total of 193 patients (65%) had a positive tilt test response; 89% of these 193 required isoproterenol challenge to elicit this response. Patients with a positive tilt test result had lower values for heart rate at rest (mean +/- SD 69 +/- 13 vs. 74 +/- 14 beats/min, p = 0.046) and systolic blood pressure (137 +/- 28 vs. 145 +/- 30 mm Hg, p = 0.0018) at baseline than did the patients with a negative tilt test result. Intravenous propranolol blocked the positive response in 163 (90%) of 181 patients retested. Oral beta-blockers were effective by tilt test criteria in 118 (94%) of 125 patients; 12 (10%) had recurrent clinical symptoms while taking beta-blockers. Eight (42%) of 19 patients who had a negative tilt test response during beta-blocker therapy had recurrent symptoms when they stopped therapy. Three (23%) of 13 patients receiving empiric beta-blocker therapy had recurrent symptoms. The follow-up period for the patients with a positive tilt test result was 28 +/- 11 months (range 5 to 48).
Intravenous propranolol is effective in preventing neurocardiogenic syncope diagnosed during head-up tilt testing and predicts the response to oral beta-blocker therapy. Oral beta-blocker therapy prevents recurrent syncope in the majority of patients. Recurrence of syncope is lowest when efficacy of oral beta-blocker therapy is confirmed by repeat head-up tilt testing.
本研究旨在前瞻性评估由直立倾斜试验指导的药物治疗对不明原因晕厥和接近晕厥的长期疗效。
直立倾斜试验用于评估不明原因晕厥患者。急性药物试验的有效性以及长期口服治疗预防复发性晕厥的疗效尚未在大量患者群体中进行研究。
我们研究了296例连续的不明原因晕厥或接近晕厥患者,他们接受了80度直立倾斜试验,包括有无异丙肾上腺素激发试验。通过重复试验评估静脉和口服β受体阻滞剂治疗的疗效。对治疗有阳性和阴性反应的患者均随访晕厥复发率。
共有193例患者(65%)倾斜试验反应阳性;这193例患者中89%需要异丙肾上腺素激发试验来引发此反应。倾斜试验结果阳性的患者在基线时静息心率(平均±标准差69±13对74±14次/分钟,p = 0.046)和收缩压(137±28对145±30 mmHg,p = 0.0018)低于倾斜试验结果阴性的患者。在181例再次测试的患者中,静脉注射普萘洛尔使163例(90%)的阳性反应受到抑制。根据倾斜试验标准,口服β受体阻滞剂在125例患者中的118例(94%)有效;12例(10%)在服用β受体阻滞剂时有复发性临床症状。在β受体阻滞剂治疗期间倾斜试验反应阴性的19例患者中有8例(42%)在停药后出现复发性症状。接受经验性β受体阻滞剂治疗的13例患者中有3例(23%)出现复发性症状。倾斜试验结果阳性的患者随访期为28±11个月(范围5至48个月)。
静脉注射普萘洛尔可有效预防直立倾斜试验诊断的神经心源性晕厥,并可预测口服β受体阻滞剂治疗的反应。口服β受体阻滞剂治疗可预防大多数患者的复发性晕厥。当通过重复直立倾斜试验确认口服β受体阻滞剂治疗的疗效时,晕厥复发率最低。