Glover Scott
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003 Aug;27(5):447-56. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00072-1.
Optic ataxia is characterized by inaccuracies in body movements under visual control, and is a common consequence of damage to the posterior parietal lobes in humans. It is argued here that optic ataxia can be characterized as a deficit in the visual on-line guidance of actions, with action planning remaining relatively intact. This contrasts with the common view of optic ataxia as representing a deficit in the transformations that take place between visual inputs and motor outputs. Evidence in support of the planning-control view comes from the pattern of spared and disrupted behaviors in patients with optic ataxia. It is shown that spared behaviors are those that emphasize planning, whereas disrupted behaviors are those that emphasize control. In particular, recent studies have highlighted the inability of a patient with optic ataxia to make on-line adjustments to targets that change position during the movement. Taken in sum, the data from patients with optic ataxia is more consistent with the planning-control interpretation of optic ataxia than with the visuomotor transformation interpretation.
视觉性共济失调的特征是在视觉控制下身体动作不准确,是人类顶叶后部受损的常见后果。本文认为,视觉性共济失调可被描述为动作的视觉在线引导方面的缺陷,而动作规划相对保持完好。这与将视觉性共济失调视为视觉输入和运动输出之间发生的转换存在缺陷的常见观点形成对比。支持规划 - 控制观点的证据来自视觉性共济失调患者中保留和受干扰行为的模式。结果表明,保留的行为是那些强调规划的行为,而受干扰的行为是那些强调控制的行为。特别是,最近的研究突出了一名视觉性共济失调患者无法对运动过程中改变位置的目标进行在线调整。总之,来自视觉性共济失调患者的数据与视觉性共济失调的规划 - 控制解释比与视觉运动转换解释更一致。