Pfefferbaum Adolf, Adalsteinsson Elfar, Sullivan Edith V
Neuroscience Program, SRI International, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Oct;18(4):427-33. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10377.
To evaluate within-scanner and between-scanner reliability of fractional anisotropy (FA) and trace (sum of the diagonal elements of the diffusion tensor) as measured by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).
Ten young healthy adults were scanned on three separate days, on two different systems made by the same manufacturer. One scan was acquired at one site, and two scans were acquired on two different occasions on another scanner at another site. Three levels of analysis were used to compare the DTI metrics: 1) a voxel-by-voxel analysis of all supratentorial brain (gray matter + white matter + cerebrospinal fluid) and of supratentorial white matter; 2) a slice-by-slice analysis of supratentorial white matter; and 3) a single-region analysis of the corpus callosum.
The voxel-by-voxel analysis of all supratentorial brain found that FA and trace measures and correlations were equivalently and significantly higher within than across scanners. For supratentorial white matter, FA was similar within and across scanners, whereas trace demonstrated across-scanner bias. A similar pattern was observed for the slice-by-slice comparison. For the single-region analysis of the corpus callosum, within-scanner FA and trace measures were highly reproducible for FA (CV = 1.9%) and trace (CV = 2.6%), but both DTI measures showed a systematic mean bias across scanners (CV = 4.5% for FA and CV = 7.5% for trace).
These estimates of measurement variation and scanner bias can be used to predict effect sizes for longitudinal and multisite studies using diffusion tensor imaging.
评估通过扩散张量成像(DTI)测量的分数各向异性(FA)和迹值(扩散张量对角元素之和)在扫描仪内和扫描仪间的可靠性。
10名年轻健康成年人在三天内分别在同一制造商生产的两种不同系统上进行扫描。一次扫描在一个站点进行,另外两次扫描在另一个站点的另一台扫描仪上的两个不同时间进行。使用三个分析级别来比较DTI指标:1)对所有幕上脑区(灰质 + 白质 + 脑脊液)和幕上白质进行逐体素分析;2)对幕上白质进行逐层分析;3)对胼胝体进行单区域分析。
对所有幕上脑区的逐体素分析发现,FA和迹值测量以及相关性在扫描仪内比在扫描仪间同等且显著更高。对于幕上白质,FA在扫描仪内和扫描仪间相似,而迹值显示出扫描仪间偏差。在逐层比较中观察到类似模式。对于胼胝体的单区域分析,扫描仪内FA和迹值测量对于FA(CV = 1.9%)和迹值(CV = 2.6%)具有高度可重复性,但两种DTI测量在扫描仪间均显示出系统性平均偏差(FA的CV = 4.5%,迹值的CV = 7.5%)。
这些测量变异和扫描仪偏差的估计值可用于预测使用扩散张量成像的纵向和多站点研究的效应大小。