Gonzalez Gerardo, Feingold Alan, Oliveto Alison, Gonsai Kishor, Kosten Thomas R
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2003 Aug;29(3):497-514. doi: 10.1081/ada-120023455.
Depression is common among patients who abuse both opiates and cocaine, and its treatment has had mixed success. This study compares buprenorphine-maintained patients with lifetime major depressive disorder (MDD, N = 53) with those never depressed (ND, N = 96) on cocaine and opiate-free urines during a 12-week outpatient double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. The 149 subjects were assigned to four groups: 1) desipramine (DMI) + contingency management (CM); 2) DMI + noncontingency management (NCM); 3) placebo + CM; and 4) placebo + NCM. Depression assessments included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Inventory, and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV interview for diagnosis of lifetime MDD. Urine toxicologies were performed thrice weekly and the CES-D was performed monthly. The MDD group had a larger proportion of females (45% vs 21%, P = 0.02) and were more likely to be married (13.2% vs 7.3%, P = 0.02) than the ND group. Treatment retention did not vary by depression status. Hierarchical Linear Modeling found that depressive symptoms decreased comparably across the four treatment groups. Although participation in CM improved drug-free urines more for patients with MDD than for the ND group (Z = 2.44, P = 0.01), treatment with DMI was significantly more efficacious for the ND group than for the MDD group (Z = -2.89, P = 0.003). These results suggest that patients with MDD may respond better to behavioral treatments such as CM than to desipramine plus buprenorphine. The ND cocaine-abusing, opiate-dependent patients may be more responsive to the anticraving effects of DMI.
抑郁症在同时滥用阿片类药物和可卡因的患者中很常见,其治疗效果不一。本研究在一项为期12周的门诊双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验中,比较了患有终生重度抑郁症(MDD,N = 53)的丁丙诺啡维持治疗患者与从未患过抑郁症(ND,N = 96)的患者在可卡因和阿片类药物检测呈阴性的尿液情况。149名受试者被分为四组:1)地昔帕明(DMI)+应急管理(CM);2)DMI +非应急管理(NCM);3)安慰剂+ CM;4)安慰剂+ NCM。抑郁评估包括汉密尔顿抑郁量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表,以及用于诊断终生MDD的DSM-IV结构化临床访谈。每周进行三次尿液毒理学检测,每月进行一次CES-D检测。MDD组女性比例高于ND组(45%对21%,P = 0.02),且结婚的可能性更大(13.2%对7.3%,P = 0.02)。治疗保留率不因抑郁状态而异。分层线性模型发现,四个治疗组的抑郁症状均有类似程度的减轻。尽管参与CM对MDD患者的无药尿液改善情况比对ND组更明显(Z = 2.44,P = 0.01),但DMI治疗对ND组的疗效显著高于MDD组(Z = -2.89,P = 0.003)。这些结果表明,MDD患者可能对CM等行为治疗的反应比对地昔帕明加丁丙诺啡的反应更好。ND组滥用可卡因、依赖阿片类药物的患者可能对DMI的抗渴望作用反应更敏感。