Sweeney D G, Cromar N J, Nixon J B, Ta C T, Fallowfield H J
Dept. of Environmental Health, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(2):211-8.
Over the past fifty years, considerable research in waste stabilization pond operation has led to the development of a number of models used to describe the hydraulic regime and predict treatment efficiency. Models range in complexity from plug or completely mixed simplifications to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models which are able to predict flow hydraulics at a local level. Information about the exit age of pond effluent can be used to estimate pollutant decay. However, a mechanistic approach to understanding pond operation highlights the importance of knowing both the time and spatial history of pond effluent. A CFD model of a large pond system was constructed to demonstrate various hydraulic scenarios under different boundary conditions. Two scenarios were compared to visually demonstrate the effects of differing hydraulic conditions. Typical mechanistic models were applied to each condition to quantify biological differences. This simple example indicates that integrating biological and localised flow models will lead to a more holistic understanding of pond operation and treatment efficiency.
在过去的五十年里,对稳定塘运行进行了大量研究,从而开发出了一些用于描述水力状况和预测处理效率的模型。模型的复杂程度各异,从推流或完全混合的简化模型到能够在局部层面预测水流水力情况的计算流体动力学(CFD)模型。关于塘出水停留时间的信息可用于估算污染物的衰减。然而,一种理解池塘运行的机理方法突出了了解塘出水时间和空间历史的重要性。构建了一个大型池塘系统的CFD模型,以展示不同边界条件下的各种水力情景。比较了两种情景,以直观展示不同水力条件的影响。将典型的机理模型应用于每种条件,以量化生物学差异。这个简单的例子表明,将生物学模型和局部水流模型相结合,将能更全面地理解池塘运行和处理效率。