Díez-Pérez Adolfo, Marín Fernando, Vila Joan, Abizanda Mercedes, Cervera Artur, Carbonell Cristina, Alcolea Rosa Ma, Cama Adoración, Rama Teresa, Galindo Elena, Olmos Carmen
Unidad de Investigación de Fisiopatología sea y Articular, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Universitat Autonoma, Barcelona, Spain.
J Clin Densitom. 2003 Fall;6(3):237-45. doi: 10.1385/jcd:6:3:237.
Screening of osteoporosis by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has become widely available in Europe, but no clear strategies for its clinical use have been established. The aim of this study was to validate the use of QUS in a cross-sectional study carried out in three primary care centers. Measurements of calcaneal QUS and bone mineral density (BMD) at proximal femur were obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis was diagnosed by DXA T-score <or= -2.5 at the femoral neck. Sensitivity, specificity, kappa index, and receives operator characteristics (ROC) curve QUS values were calculated with respect to the standard reference. Both positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) were used to calculate the optimum cut-off levels. Two hundred and sixty-seven women aged 65 or older were included. Fifty-five percent had osteoporotic femoral neck BMD values (T-score <or= -2.5). The same threshold for QUS yielded a lower prevalence of osteoporosis (10%). Women with BMD diagnosis of osteoporosis were older and showed lower age-adjusted values for all QUS parameters (p < 0.001). Area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.662-0.678 for the different QUS parameters; correlation and concordance of all parameters with femoral neck BMD were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Cut-off values calculated from the AUC yielded 61.1% sensitivity and 65.3% specificity for the best QUS parameter (i.e., Estimated Heel T-score <or= -1.55). Estimated Heel T-score values of +0.05 or above ruled out osteoporosis (LR 0.18), whereas those -2.50 or below supported the diagnosis (LR 5.98). The application of these cutoff points allowed classification of 22.1% of cases. In conclusion, in postmenopausal women, QUS screening conclusively confirms or rules out osteoporosis in approximately one-fifth of cases, thereby avoiding the need for a DXA measurement.
在欧洲,通过定量超声(QUS)筛查骨质疏松症已广泛应用,但尚未确立明确的临床应用策略。本研究的目的是在三个初级保健中心开展的一项横断面研究中验证QUS的应用。通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量跟骨QUS和股骨近端骨密度(BMD)。根据股骨颈DXA T值≤ -2.5诊断骨质疏松症。针对标准参考值计算敏感性、特异性、kappa指数和接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线QUS值。使用阳性和阴性似然比(LR)计算最佳截断水平。纳入了267名65岁及以上的女性。55%的女性股骨颈BMD值为骨质疏松(T值≤ -2.5)。相同的QUS阈值导致骨质疏松症患病率较低(为10%)。经BMD诊断为骨质疏松症的女性年龄更大,所有QUS参数的年龄校正值更低(p < 0.001)。不同QUS参数的曲线下面积(AUC)范围为0.662 - 0.678;所有参数与股骨颈BMD的相关性和一致性具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。根据AUC计算的截断值对最佳QUS参数(即估计足跟T值≤ -1.55)产生了61.1%的敏感性和65.3%的特异性。估计足跟T值为+0.05或更高可排除骨质疏松症(LR 0.18),而那些≤ -