Suppr超能文献

[阿尔茨海默病型老年痴呆中的听力障碍]

[Hearing impairment in senile dementia of Alzheimer's type].

作者信息

Wang Ning-yu, Yang Hui-jie, Su Jin-fei, Kong Feng, Zhang Ming-xia, Yan Bo, Dong Hui-qing, Zhang Xin-qing, Jia Jian-ping, Han De-min

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Jun;38(3):198-201.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pure tone hearing threshold and word recognition score of senile dementia of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and to analyze the relationship between hearing loss and the cognition impairment.

METHODS

Pure tone audiometry, word recognition score (WRS), acoustic immittance and auditory brainstem response (ABR) are used to evaluate the auditory function of 43 patients with AD and 50 subjects of the control group. The confounding factors are controlled.

RESULTS

The average age of 43 dementia patients was 72.7 +/- 6.4, and 69.7% was female. Bilateral hearing thresholds are similar in all subjects. All indices but Mini-mental scale of equastionnaire (MMSE) of patients and control group were not statistically different. There was no significant difference in pure tone audiometry (PTA), PTA2 (dB HL, mean +/- s) and WRS (%, mean +/- s) between the two groups (P > 0.05), therefore the hearing threshold of AD group (PTA = 26.3 +/- 8.5, PTA2 = 29.1 +/- 8.7, WRS = 85.5 +/- 15.5) is lower than that of control group (PTA = 23.2 +/- 10.6, PTA2 = 26.2 +/- 11.8, WRS = 87.6 +/- 16.8). No significant difference was found between the two groups in audiometry reliability, acoustic immittance and ABR (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was found between the peripheral hearing dysfunction of AD patients and that normal elderly people, i.e., PTA, PTA2 and WRS were not related to MMSE.

摘要

目的

评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)型老年痴呆患者的纯音听阈及言语识别得分,并分析听力损失与认知障碍之间的关系。

方法

采用纯音听力测试、言语识别得分(WRS)、声导抗及听性脑干反应(ABR)对43例AD患者及50例对照组受试者的听觉功能进行评估。对混杂因素进行控制。

结果

43例痴呆患者的平均年龄为72.7±6.4岁,女性占69.7%。所有受试者双侧听力阈值相似。患者组和对照组除简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)外的所有指标均无统计学差异。两组之间的纯音听力测试(PTA)、PTA2(dB HL,均值±标准差)及WRS(%,均值±标准差)无显著差异(P>0.05),因此AD组的听力阈值(PTA = 26.3±8.5,PTA2 = 29.1±8.7,WRS = 85.5±15.5)低于对照组(PTA = 23.2±10.6,PTA2 = 26.2±11.8,WRS = 87.6±16.8)。两组在听力测试可靠性、声导抗及ABR方面未发现显著差异(P<0.05)。

结论

AD患者的外周听力功能障碍与正常老年人之间无显著差异,即PTA、PTA2及WRS与MMSE无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验