• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体与个体中的行动协调:学习预期控制。

Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control.

作者信息

Knoblich Günther, Jordan Jerome Scott

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Cognition and Action, Amalienstrasse 33, 80799 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):1006-16. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.1006.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.1006
PMID:14516231
Abstract

When individuals act alone, they can internally coordinate the actions at hand. Such coordination is not feasible when individuals act together in a group. The present research examines to what extent groups encounter specific challenges when acting jointly and whether these challenges impede extending planning into the future. Individuals and groups carried out a tracking task that required learning a new anticipatory control strategy. The results show that groups face additional demands that are harder to overcome when planning needs to be extended into the future. Information about others' actions is a necessary condition for groups to effectively learn to extend their plans. Possible mechanisms for exerting and learning anticipatory control are discussed.

摘要

当个体单独行动时,他们能够在内部协调手头的行动。而当个体在群体中共同行动时,这种协调是不可行的。本研究考察了群体在共同行动时在多大程度上面临特定挑战,以及这些挑战是否会阻碍将规划延伸至未来。个体和群体执行了一项追踪任务,该任务需要学习一种新的预期控制策略。结果表明,当需要将规划延伸至未来时,群体面临着更难克服的额外要求。关于他人行动的信息是群体有效学习以扩展其计划的必要条件。文中还讨论了实施和学习预期控制的可能机制。

相似文献

1
Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control.群体与个体中的行动协调:学习预期控制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):1006-16. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.1006.
2
Is there a specific executive capacity for dual task coordination? Evidence from Alzheimer's disease.是否存在特定的执行能力来进行双重任务协调?来自阿尔茨海默病的证据。
Neuropsychology. 2004 Jul;18(3):504-13. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.504.
3
Dynamic perception in chess.国际象棋中的动态感知。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Feb;59(2):397-410. doi: 10.1080/17470210500151428.
4
Parallel networks operating across attentional deployment and motion processing: a multi-seed partial least squares fMRI study.跨注意力部署和运动处理运行的并行网络:一项多种子偏最小二乘功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 15;29(4):1192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.010. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
5
Children with a learning disorder show prospective control impairments during visuomanual tracking.学习障碍儿童在视动追踪任务中表现出前瞻性控制损伤。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
6
Action type and goal type modulate goal-directed gaze shifts in 14-month-old infants.动作类型和目标类型会调节14个月大婴儿的目标导向性注视转移。
Dev Psychol. 2009 Jul;45(4):1190-4. doi: 10.1037/a0015667.
7
The role of expertise in tool use: skill differences in functional action adaptations to task constraints.专长在工具使用中的作用:技能差异对功能动作适应任务约束的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Aug;36(4):825-39. doi: 10.1037/a0018171.
8
The planning of tool-to-object relations in young children.幼儿工具与物体关系的规划。
Dev Psychobiol. 2006 Mar;48(2):178-86. doi: 10.1002/dev.20117.
9
Reasoning and dyslexia: a spatial strategy may impede reasoning with visually rich information.推理与阅读障碍:一种空间策略可能会妨碍对视觉信息丰富的内容进行推理。
Br J Psychol. 2007 Feb;98(Pt 1):79-92. doi: 10.1348/000712606X103987.
10
Performance as a function of ability, resources invested, and strategy used.表现是能力、投入资源和所采用策略的函数。
J Gen Psychol. 2009 Jan;136(1):41-69. doi: 10.3200/GENP.136.1.41-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Human intergroup coordination in a hierarchical multi-agent sensorimotor task arises from concurrent co-optimization.在分层多智能体感觉运动任务中,人类群体间协调源于并发协同优化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97574-3.
2
Predicting group benefits in joint multiple object tracking : Predicting group benefits.预测联合多目标跟踪中的群体效益:预测群体效益。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1962-1975. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02693-6. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
The spontaneous emergence of rhythmic coordination in turn taking.
轮流发言中节奏协调的自发出现。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 24;13(1):3259. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18480-6.
4
Follow the sound of my violin: Granger causality reflects information flow in sound.跟随我小提琴的声音:格兰杰因果关系反映了声音中的信息流。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 3;16:982177. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.982177. eCollection 2022.
5
Interacting humans use forces in specific frequencies to exchange information by touch.互动的人会使用特定频率的力通过触摸来交换信息。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 21;12(1):15752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19500-1.
6
When action prediction grows old: An fMRI study.当动作预测不再流行:一项 fMRI 研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Feb 1;44(2):373-387. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26049. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
7
Joint control of visually guided actions involves concordant increases in behavioural and neural coupling.视觉引导动作的联合控制涉及行为和神经耦合的一致性增加。
Commun Biol. 2021 Jun 29;4(1):816. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02319-3.
8
Musical novices perform with equal accuracy when learning to drum alone or with a peer.音乐新手在独自学习打鼓或与同伴一起学习打鼓时,表现出同等的准确性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 14;11(1):12422. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91820-0.
9
Mechanisms for mutual support in motor interactions.运动相互作用中的相互支持机制。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82138-y.
10
Crossmodal correspondences as common ground for joint action.跨模态对应关系作为联合行动的共同基础。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jan;212:103222. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103222. Epub 2020 Dec 7.