Chipps Steven R, Dunbar Jessica A, Wahl David H
USGS South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Oecologia. 2004 Jan;138(1):32-8. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1396-z. Epub 2003 Sep 27.
Bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) are known to diversify into two forms specialized for foraging on either limnetic or littoral prey. Because juvenile bluegills seek vegetative cover in the presence of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) predators, natural selection should favor the littoral body design at size ranges most vulnerable to predation. Yet within bluegill populations, both limnetic and littoral forms occur where vegetation and predators are present. While adaptive for foraging in different environments, does habitat-linked phenotypic variation also influence predator evasiveness for juvenile bluegills? We evaluate this question by quantifying susceptibility to predation for two groups of morphologically distinct bluegills; a limnetic form characteristic of bluegills inhabiting open water areas (limnetic bluegill) and a littoral form characteristic of bluegills inhabiting dense vegetation (littoral bluegill). In a series of predation trials, we found that bluegill behaviors differed in open water habitat but not in simulated vegetation. In open water habitat, limnetic bluegills formed more dense shoaling aggregations, maintained a larger distance from the predator, and required longer amounts of time to capture than littoral bluegill. When provided with simulated vegetation, largemouth bass spent longer amounts of time pursuing littoral bluegill and captured significantly fewer littoral bluegills than limnetic fish. Hence, morphological and behavioral variation in bluegills was linked to differential susceptibility to predation in open water and vegetated environments. Combined with previous studies, these findings show that morphological and behavioral adaptations enhance both foraging performance and predator evasiveness in different lake habitats.
蓝鳃太阳鱼(Lepomis macrochirus)已知会分化为两种形态,分别专门以湖沼带或沿岸带的猎物为食。由于幼年蓝鳃太阳鱼在大口黑鲈(Micropterus salmoides)捕食者存在的情况下会寻找植被掩护,自然选择应该会在最易被捕食的大小范围内青睐沿岸带的身体设计。然而在蓝鳃太阳鱼种群中,在有植被和捕食者的地方,湖沼带和沿岸带形态都有出现。虽然在不同环境中觅食具有适应性,但与栖息地相关的表型变异是否也会影响幼年蓝鳃太阳鱼躲避捕食者的能力呢?我们通过量化两组形态不同的蓝鳃太阳鱼的被捕食易感性来评估这个问题;一种是栖息在开阔水域的蓝鳃太阳鱼的湖沼带形态(湖沼带蓝鳃太阳鱼),另一种是栖息在茂密植被中的蓝鳃太阳鱼的沿岸带形态(沿岸带蓝鳃太阳鱼)。在一系列捕食试验中,我们发现蓝鳃太阳鱼的行为在开阔水域栖息地有所不同,但在模拟植被中没有差异。在开阔水域栖息地,湖沼带蓝鳃太阳鱼形成更密集的浅滩聚集,与捕食者保持更大的距离,并且比沿岸带蓝鳃太阳鱼需要更长的时间才能被捕食。当提供模拟植被时,大口黑鲈追捕沿岸带蓝鳃太阳鱼的时间更长,捕获的沿岸带蓝鳃太阳鱼明显少于湖沼带蓝鳃太阳鱼。因此,蓝鳃太阳鱼的形态和行为变异与在开阔水域和植被环境中不同的被捕食易感性有关。结合先前的研究,这些发现表明形态和行为适应在不同的湖泊栖息地中既增强了觅食性能又提高了躲避捕食者的能力。