Suppr超能文献

股浅动脉内膜切除术:一项值得重新考虑的手术。

Endarterectomy of the superficial femoral artery: a procedure worth reconsidering.

作者信息

van der Heijden F H, Eikelboom B C, van Reedt Dortland R W, van der Graaf Y, Steijling J J, Legemate D A, van Vroonhoven T J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Surg. 1992 Nov;6(6):651-8. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80845-x.

Abstract

The preferred management of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease remains unresolved. The oldest technique for restoring vascular continuity, endarterectomy, has been largely replaced by bypass operations and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. We have continued to perform semi-closed endarterectomy in selected cases and review here a series of 231 consecutive cases in 197 patients treated during the last 10 years. The indication for the endarterectomy was disabling claudication in 186 operations (80%), rest pain in 21 (9%) and gangrene in 24 (11%). The superficial femoral artery abnormality consisted of 1-10 cm occlusion in 52 cases (23%), > 10 cm occlusion in 96 (41%), single stenosis in 21 (9%), multiple stenoses in 28 (12%) and it was unknown in 34 cases (15%). Postoperative mortality was 0.8% with a complication rate of 10%. Five year cumulative primary patency was 71% overall, 75% in patients with disabling claudication, 61% in those with rest pain and 46% in those with gangrene. Eight year patency was 55% (S.E. 5.4%). No difference in 5-year cumulative patency was seen between treatment for stenosis or occlusion (74 and 70%, respectively). The results of earlier studies and the current study raise the question of whether endarterectomy should be the first treatment of choice in obstructive lesions of the superficial femoral artery. The results of endarterectomy are better than can be achieved with angioplasty and compare well with the results of femoropopliteal bypass. Endarterectomy has specific advantages above femoro-popliteal bypass: the autologous saphenous vein is spared for future use and in case of failure of the endarterectomy, femoro-popliteal bypass remains possible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

股浅动脉闭塞性疾病的最佳治疗方法仍未确定。恢复血管连续性的最古老技术,即动脉内膜切除术,在很大程度上已被旁路手术和经皮腔内血管成形术所取代。我们在特定病例中继续进行半封闭动脉内膜切除术,并在此回顾过去10年中治疗的197例患者的连续231例病例。动脉内膜切除术的适应证为:186例手术(80%)有致残性间歇性跛行,21例(9%)有静息痛,24例(11%)有坏疽。股浅动脉异常包括:52例(23%)为1 - 10厘米闭塞,96例(41%)为大于10厘米闭塞,21例(9%)为单一狭窄,28例(12%)为多发狭窄,34例(15%)情况不明。术后死亡率为0.8%,并发症发生率为10%。总体五年累积原发性通畅率为71%,致残性间歇性跛行患者为75%,静息痛患者为61%,坏疽患者为46%。八年通畅率为55%(标准误5.4%)。狭窄或闭塞治疗的五年累积通畅率无差异(分别为74%和70%)。早期研究结果和当前研究结果提出了一个问题,即动脉内膜切除术是否应作为股浅动脉阻塞性病变的首选治疗方法。动脉内膜切除术的结果优于血管成形术,与股腘旁路手术的结果相当。动脉内膜切除术相对于股腘旁路手术具有特定优势:保留自体大隐静脉以备将来使用,并且在动脉内膜切除术失败的情况下,股腘旁路手术仍可行。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验