Suppr超能文献

[阑尾炎诊断评分的临床价值:一项前瞻性干预研究的结果]

[Clinical value of diagnostic score for appendicitis: results of a prospective intervention study].

作者信息

Franke C, Ohmann C, Yang Q

机构信息

Heinrich Heine Universität, Düsseldorf.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1998;115(Suppl I):511-5.

Abstract

The clinical benefit of a diagnostic score for acute appendicitis was tested in a prospective interventional multicenter study on patients with abdominal pain. The study was performed in two consecutive phases: standard diagnostic work-up with no additional diagnostic support (870 patients) and additional diagnostic support with a score (614 patients). The two groups were comparable with respect to signs, symptoms and investigations related to acute appendicitis. Diagnostic performance of the final examiner decreased with the score: specificity from 86% to 78%, positive predictive value from 67% to 50% and accuracy from 88% to 81%. There were no differences in the perforated appendix, negative appendectomy and complication rate, however, the delayed appendectomy rate (2% versus 8%) and the delayed discharge rate (11% versus 22%) were significantly lower with diagnostic support by the score. In summary, the score cannot be recommended as a standard diagnostic tool for diagnostic decision making in acute appendicitis.

摘要

在一项针对腹痛患者的前瞻性干预多中心研究中,对急性阑尾炎诊断评分的临床益处进行了测试。该研究分两个连续阶段进行:无额外诊断支持的标准诊断检查(870例患者)和使用评分的额外诊断支持(614例患者)。两组在与急性阑尾炎相关的体征、症状和检查方面具有可比性。最终检查者的诊断性能随评分下降:特异性从86%降至78%,阳性预测值从67%降至50%,准确性从88%降至81%。穿孔性阑尾炎、阴性阑尾切除术和并发症发生率没有差异,然而,使用评分进行诊断支持时,延迟阑尾切除术发生率(2%对8%)和延迟出院率(11%对22%)显著更低。总之,该评分不能被推荐作为急性阑尾炎诊断决策的标准诊断工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验