• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在志愿者长时间、可控的过敏原激发试验中,对目前使用的三种抗组胺药——阿司咪唑、氯雷他定和特非那定强力片的起效时间和作用持续时间进行了研究。

Onset and duration of the effects of three antihistamines in current use--astemizole, loratadine and terfenadine forte--studied during prolonged, controlled allergen challenges in volunteers.

作者信息

Horak F, Jäger S, Berger U

机构信息

First Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1992 Sep;20(5):422-34. doi: 10.1177/030006059202000507.

DOI:10.1177/030006059202000507
PMID:1451923
Abstract

In a three-way, double-blind, crossover study the onset of action and effects at the end of the dosing interval of 10 mg/day astemizole, 10 mg/day loratadine and 120 mg/day terfenadine forte given for 3 days to six atopic volunteers were assessed using the Vienna challenge chamber (VCC). With each treatment, two long-term pollen challenges were performed in the VCC: the first to assess the onset of action started 1 h before the first dose and lasted continuously for 5 h; the second to assess the effects at the end of dosing took place 21 h after the last of the three doses and lasted 3 h. All three drug treatments initiated 1 h after the beginning of challenge with grass pollen reversed the adverse effects of challenge on the subjective symptoms (runny, blocked or itchy nose, sneezing, itchy eyes, tears) and the objective parameters (nasal secretions, nasal resistance, nasal flow, flow increase, nasal peak flow) within 1-3 h. The mean time to onset of action was 107 min for astemizole, 117 min after treatment for loratadine and 153 min for terfenadine forte. During the second allergen challenge, 21-24 h after intake, astemizole consistently provided better protection for all parameters than did loratadine or terfenadine forte; however the differences were not statistically significant.

摘要

在一项三向、双盲、交叉研究中,使用维也纳激发试验箱(VCC)评估了6名特应性志愿者连续3天服用10毫克/天阿司咪唑、10毫克/天氯雷他定和120毫克/天特非那定长效制剂的起效时间和给药间隔期末的效果。每种治疗方案在VCC中进行两次长期花粉激发试验:第一次评估起效时间,在首剂前1小时开始,持续5小时;第二次评估给药期末的效果,在三剂中的最后一剂后21小时进行,持续3小时。所有三种药物治疗均在草花粉激发试验开始1小时后开始,在1 - 3小时内逆转了激发试验对主观症状(流涕、鼻塞或鼻痒、打喷嚏、眼痒、流泪)和客观参数(鼻分泌物、鼻阻力、鼻流量、流量增加、鼻峰流量)的不良影响。阿司咪唑的平均起效时间为107分钟,氯雷他定治疗后为117分钟,特非那定长效制剂为153分钟。在摄入后21 - 24小时的第二次过敏原激发试验期间,阿司咪唑对所有参数的保护作用始终优于氯雷他定或特非那定长效制剂;然而,差异无统计学意义。

相似文献

1
Onset and duration of the effects of three antihistamines in current use--astemizole, loratadine and terfenadine forte--studied during prolonged, controlled allergen challenges in volunteers.在志愿者长时间、可控的过敏原激发试验中,对目前使用的三种抗组胺药——阿司咪唑、氯雷他定和特非那定强力片的起效时间和作用持续时间进行了研究。
J Int Med Res. 1992 Sep;20(5):422-34. doi: 10.1177/030006059202000507.
2
Onset of action and efficacy of terfenadine, astemizole, cetirizine, and loratadine for the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis.特非那定、阿司咪唑、西替利嗪和氯雷他定缓解变应性鼻炎症状的起效时间和疗效。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Aug;79(2):163-72. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63104-3.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of astemizole-D and Loratadine-D during prolonged, controlled allergen challenge in the Vienna Challenge Chamber.在维也纳激发试验舱进行的长期、可控过敏原激发试验中,阿司咪唑-D和氯雷他定-D的疗效及耐受性。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1996 Nov;46(11):1077-81.
4
Comparative efficacy of terfenadine, loratadine, and astemizole in perennial allergic rhinitis.特非那定、氯雷他定和阿司咪唑在常年性变应性鼻炎中的疗效比较
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 May;118(5):668-73. doi: 10.1177/019459989811800517.
5
Comparison of loratadine and terfenadine in allergic seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis with emphasis on nasal stuffiness and peak flow.
Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 Oct;42(10):1227-31.
6
Changes in skin-test reactivity do not correlate with clinical efficacy of H1-blockers in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Allergy. 1998 Jun;53(6):579-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03933.x.
7
Evaluation of the potential cardiotoxicity of the antihistamines terfenadine, astemizole, loratadine, and cetirizine in atopic children.对特非那定、阿司咪唑、氯雷他定和西替利嗪等抗组胺药在特应性儿童中的潜在心脏毒性评估。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998 Apr;80(4):333-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62979-1.
8
Second generation antihistamines in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis due to Parietaria and cypress pollen.第二代抗组胺药治疗因墙草属植物和柏树花粉引起的季节性变应性鼻炎。
Pharmacol Res. 2001 Dec;44(6):461-6. doi: 10.1006/phrs.2001.0878.
9
Effects of loratadine and terfenadine on the induced nasal allergic reaction.氯雷他定和特非那定对诱发的鼻过敏反应的影响。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Mar;122(3):309-16. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890150083015.
10
[Comparison of the inhibition of the cutaneous histamine test by astemizole, loratadine, and terfenadine].[阿司咪唑、氯雷他定和特非那定对皮肤组胺试验抑制作用的比较]
Rev Alerg. 1993 Jul-Aug;40(4):86-90.

引用本文的文献

1
A Modern Approach to Clinical Outcome Assessment in Allergy Management: Advantages of Allergen Exposure Chambers.过敏管理中临床结局评估的现代方法:过敏原暴露室的优势
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 29;13(23):7268. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237268.
2
Peripheral erythrocytes decrease upon specific respiratory challenge with grass pollen allergen in sensitized mice and in human subjects.在致敏小鼠和人类受试者中,用草花粉过敏原进行特异性呼吸激发后,外周红细胞会减少。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e86701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086701. eCollection 2014.
3
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review.
地氯雷他定、非索非那定和左西替利嗪的临床药代动力学与药效学:一项比较性综述
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(4):217-30. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200847040-00001.
4
Ocular toxicity of systemic asthma and allergy treatments.全身性哮喘和过敏治疗的眼部毒性。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2006 Jul;6(4):299-305. doi: 10.1007/s11882-006-0063-y.
5
Astemizole. A nonsedating antihistamine with fast and sustained activity.阿司咪唑。一种具有快速和持久活性的非镇静性抗组胺药。
Clin Rev Allergy. 1993 Spring;11(1):35-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02802293.
6
Seasonal allergic rhinitis. Newer treatment approaches.季节性变应性鼻炎。新的治疗方法。
Drugs. 1993 Apr;45(4):518-27. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345040-00004.