Bonnet Udo, Banger Markus, Leweke F Markus, Specka Michael, Müller Bernhard W, Hashemi Thilo, Nyhuis Peter W, Kutscher Sven, Burtscheidt Wilhelm, Gastpar Markus
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Essen, Essen, Germany.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Oct;23(5):514-9. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000088905.24613.ad.
A few case reports and data from animal experiments point to a possible efficacy of gabapentin (GP) in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Because of ethical considerations, the efficacy of GP in acute AWS was tested in an add-on fashion to clomethiazole (CLO). Given that the symptom-triggered amount of CLO required to limit AWS within the first 24 hours is related to the severity of AWS, we tested this amount of CLO during placebo (P) or GP (400 mg qid) under double blind, randomized conditions. Sixty-one patients (P = 29/GP = 32) suffering from alcohol dependence (ICD-10) and without any other psychiatric condition or psychotropic medication were included. The groups were not significantly different in baseline characteristics (eg, demographic data, severity of AWS). Both ITT and completer analyses revealed no significant differences between the groups considering the primary effectiveness measure: amount of CLO required in the first 24 hours (P = 6.1 +/- 5.4/GP = 6.2 +/- 4.7 capsules). In addition, premature discontinuations (P = 3/GP = 2) and decreases in Mainz Alcohol Withdrawal Scores were not significantly different in the first 48 hours of AWS (secondary effectiveness measures). Tolerability of combined CLO/GP was studied throughout the whole treatment comprising a 5-day lasting reduction part subsequent to the first 48 hours. Throughout the whole 7-day treatment a total of 5 and 2 patients dropped out and 6 and 5 patients reported adverse clinical events in the P and GP groups, respectively. All together, GP (400 mg qid) was no better than P in saving initial consumption of CLO or decreasing initial Mainz Alcohol Withdrawal Scores suggesting that GP was ineffective in the management of acute AWS in this model. The combination of GP and CLO was safe.
一些病例报告和动物实验数据表明,加巴喷丁(GP)在治疗酒精戒断综合征(AWS)方面可能有效。出于伦理考虑,在氯美噻唑(CLO)基础上加用GP对急性AWS的疗效进行了测试。鉴于在最初24小时内限制AWS所需的症状触发剂量的CLO与AWS的严重程度相关,我们在双盲、随机条件下,对安慰剂(P)或GP(400 mg,每日四次)状态下的该剂量CLO进行了测试。纳入了61例患有酒精依赖(国际疾病分类第10版)且无任何其他精神疾病或精神药物治疗的患者(P组 = 29例/GP组 = 32例)。两组在基线特征(如人口统计学数据、AWS严重程度)方面无显著差异。意向性分析(ITT)和完成者分析均显示,在考虑主要疗效指标(最初24小时所需的CLO剂量)时,两组之间无显著差异(P组 = 6.1±5.4粒胶囊/GP组 = 6.2±4.7粒胶囊)。此外,在AWS的最初48小时内(次要疗效指标),提前停药情况(P组 = 3例/GP组 = 2例)和美因茨酒精戒断评分的降低在两组之间也无显著差异。在包括最初48小时后的为期5天的减量期在内的整个治疗过程中,对CLO与GP联合用药的耐受性进行了研究。在整个7天的治疗过程中,P组和GP组分别共有5例和2例患者退出研究,6例和5例患者报告了不良临床事件。总体而言,在节省CLO的初始用量或降低初始美因茨酒精戒断评分方面,GP(400 mg,每日四次)并不优于P,这表明在该模型中,GP对急性AWS的管理无效。GP与CLO联合用药是安全的。