Suppr超能文献

女性陆军新兵在使用自行采集的阴道拭子或尿液筛查沙眼衣原体生殖道感染方面的偏好。

Preference among female Army recruits for use of self-administrated vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections.

作者信息

Hsieh Y-H, Howell M R, Gaydos J C, McKee K T, Quinn T C, Gaydos C A

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2003 Oct;30(10):769-73. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000079048.11771.46.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of self-administered vaginal swabs (SAS) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification tests simplifies specimen collection and transport, especially for women in nonclinical settings.

GOAL

We investigated the preference and comfort level of military women for the collection of SAS, compared with urine, for the diagnosis of genital chlamydial infections.

STUDY DESIGN

During March through August 1999, female Army recruits in basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, were invited to participate in the study. Participants were requested to complete a questionnaire after providing both first-void urine (FVU) and SAS specimens. Participant characteristics, preferences, and comfort levels were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

From 4496 eligible female recruits, 1403 (31%) completed questionnaires and 1382 provided both specimens; 11.8% (166 of 1403) of participants were infected with chlamydia. The relative sensitivity and specificity of the C. trachomatis Ligase Chain Reaction test on SAS in 1382 matched pairs was 81.1% and 98.6%, respectively, using the test result on urine specimens as the comparison standard. Most of the participants (90.8%) reported that they felt comfortable collecting the FVU specimen, and 69.6% indicated that they felt comfortable collecting SAS. Either specimen collection type received high acceptability at home and in the field, and more women reported that they would collect FVU than reported they would collect SAS in the future (in the field: FVU: 79.4%, SAS: 68.8%, P <0.001); at home: FVU: 90.9%, SAS: 82.9%, P <0.001). When questioned about ease of use, 60.4% of women reported that urine was the easier method. Preferences for SAS were associated with being white and having had sexual risk behaviors in the past 3 months.

CONCLUSION

A study of preferences for urine versus self-administered vaginal swabs for the detection of C. trachomatis in military women showed that women generally found SAS acceptable. SAS should be a feasible alternative to urine collection in situations in which specimen storage or transport is an issue.

摘要

背景

通过核酸扩增试验使用自行采集的阴道拭子(SAS)检测沙眼衣原体,简化了标本采集和运输过程,尤其适用于非临床环境中的女性。

目的

我们调查了军队女性对于采集SAS(与尿液相比)用于诊断生殖器衣原体感染的偏好和舒适度。

研究设计

在1999年3月至8月期间,邀请了在南卡罗来纳州杰克逊堡接受基础训练的陆军女性新兵参与研究。参与者在提供首次晨尿(FVU)和SAS标本后,被要求填写一份问卷。使用多因素逻辑回归评估参与者的特征、偏好和舒适度。

结果

在4496名符合条件的女性新兵中,1403人(31%)完成了问卷,1382人提供了两种标本;11.8%(1403人中的166人)的参与者感染了衣原体。以尿液标本检测结果作为比较标准,在1382对匹配样本中,SAS上沙眼衣原体连接酶链反应试验的相对灵敏度和特异性分别为81.1%和98.6%。大多数参与者(90.8%)报告说采集FVU标本时感觉舒适,69.6%的人表示采集SAS时感觉舒适。两种标本采集方式在家庭和野外都具有较高的可接受性,并且更多女性报告她们未来在野外会采集FVU而不是SAS(野外:FVU:79.4%,SAS:68.8%,P<0.001);在家庭中:FVU:90.9%,SAS:82.9%,P<0.001)。当被问及使用的便捷性时,60.4%的女性报告尿液是更简便的方法。对SAS的偏好与白人身份以及在过去3个月内有过性风险行为有关。

结论

一项关于军队女性在检测沙眼衣原体时对尿液与自行采集阴道拭子的偏好研究表明,女性总体上认为SAS是可接受的。在标本储存或运输存在问题的情况下;SAS应该是尿液采集的一种可行替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验