• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量氟硝西泮用于上消化道内镜检查的清醒镇静:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。

Low-dose flunitrazepam for conscious sedation for EGD: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.

作者信息

Yoshizawa Takashi, Miwa Hiroto, Kojima Takayo, Kawakubo Yoshiaki, Namihisa Akihiro, Ohtaka Keiichi, Ohkura Ryuichi, Nishira Youko, Toriumi Eiko, Nishira Teruo, Sato Nobuhiro

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Division of Pharmacy, Juntendo University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Oct;58(4):523-30.

PMID:14520284
Abstract

BACKGROUND

EGD with conscious sedation is a safe procedure, but complications such as hypoxia can occur. The efficacy and safety of low-dose flunitrazepam (0.25 mg) was compared with a standard dose of flunitrazepam (0.5 mg) for moderate sedation during EGD.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 75 outpatients (40 men, 35 women, mean age 45 [11] years) undergoing screening EGD were randomly assigned to one of 3 treatment arms: 0.25 mg of flunitrazepam (F0.25 group), 0.5 mg of flunitrazepam (F0.5 group), or placebo (normal saline solution), each administered intravenously. Patient tolerance was scored by using self-assessment questionnaires with visual analogue scales. Cardiopulmonary complications were assessed by monitoring blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and the electrocardiogram during the procedure.

RESULTS

The patient tolerance scores in the F0.25 and F0.5 groups, respectively 2.1 (2.1) and 2.3 (2.5), were significantly lower than that for the placebo group (6.5 [3.0]); there was no significant difference between F0.25 and F0.5. Cardiopulmonary complications in the F0.25 group were significantly lower than in the F0.5 group. Oxygen desaturation (oxygen saturation < 90%) was noted in two of 25 patients in the F0.5 group. Post-procedure drowsiness was observed in two of 24 (8.3%) patients in the F0.25 group and 3 of 21 (14.3%) in the F0.5 group (p = 0.2438).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient tolerance of EGD with low-dose flunitrazepam (0.25 mg intravenously) was similar to that with a standard dose (0.5 mg intravenously) and significantly better than in the placebo group. Oxygen desaturation was observed only in the group that received the standard dose, suggesting that sedation with low-dose flunitrazepam is efficacious and safe for EGD.

摘要

背景

清醒镇静下的上消化道内镜检查是一种安全的操作,但可能会出现诸如缺氧等并发症。本研究比较了低剂量氟硝西泮(0.25毫克)与标准剂量氟硝西泮(0.5毫克)在胃镜检查中进行中度镇静的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,75名接受胃镜筛查的门诊患者(40名男性,35名女性,平均年龄45[11]岁)被随机分配到3个治疗组之一:0.25毫克氟硝西泮(F0.25组)、0.5毫克氟硝西泮(F0.5组)或安慰剂(生理盐水溶液),每组均通过静脉给药。使用带有视觉模拟量表的自我评估问卷对患者的耐受性进行评分。在操作过程中,通过监测血压、心率、血氧饱和度和心电图来评估心肺并发症。

结果

F0.25组和F0.5组患者的耐受性评分分别为2.1(2.1)和2.3(2.5),显著低于安慰剂组(6.5[3.0]);F0.25组和F0.5组之间无显著差异。F0.25组的心肺并发症显著低于F0.5组。F0.5组25名患者中有2名出现氧饱和度下降(血氧饱和度<90%)。F0.25组24名患者中有2名(8.3%)、F0.5组21名患者中有3名(14.3%)在术后出现嗜睡(p=0.2438)。

结论

低剂量氟硝西泮(静脉注射0.25毫克)用于胃镜检查时患者的耐受性与标准剂量(静脉注射0.5毫克)相似,且显著优于安慰剂组。仅在接受标准剂量的组中观察到氧饱和度下降,这表明低剂量氟硝西泮镇静用于胃镜检查是有效且安全的。

相似文献

1
Low-dose flunitrazepam for conscious sedation for EGD: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.低剂量氟硝西泮用于上消化道内镜检查的清醒镇静:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Oct;58(4):523-30.
2
Capnographic Monitoring in Routine EGD and Colonoscopy With Moderate Sedation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.常规内镜检查和中度镇静下的二氧化碳监测:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):395-404. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.437. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions or conscious sedation effective? A randomized trial.上消化道内镜检查:准备性干预措施或清醒镇静有效吗?一项随机试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov 15;10(22):3313-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i22.3313.
4
A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation.在清醒镇静下进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查时,丙泊酚与右美托咪定用于镇静、血流动力学控制及满意度的比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Aug;40(4):419-25. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12282. Epub 2015 May 13.
5
Microstream capnography improves patient monitoring during moderate sedation: a randomized, controlled trial.微流二氧化碳监测技术改善了中度镇静期间的患者监测:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):e1170-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1709. Epub 2006 May 15.
6
Effect of diazepam sedation on arterial oxygen saturation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a placebo-controlled study.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 1996 Apr;15(2):40-2.
7
Premedication with orally administered midazolam in adults undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial.口服咪达唑仑用于接受诊断性上消化道内镜检查的成人的术前用药:一项双盲安慰剂对照随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Feb;61(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02590-8.
8
Relative abuse liability of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, flunitrazepam, and ethanol in club drug users.γ-羟基丁酸、氟硝西泮和乙醇在俱乐部毒品使用者中的相对滥用可能性
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Dec;27(6):625-38. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e31815a2542.
9
Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared with midazolam alone.与单独使用咪达唑仑相比,哌替啶联合咪达唑仑用于上消化道内镜检查镇静的疗效和安全性。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jun;91(6):1120-5.
10
Premedication with sublingual or oral alprazolam in adults undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.在接受诊断性上消化道内镜检查的成年患者中使用舌下或口服阿普唑仑进行术前用药。
Endoscopy. 2014 Aug;46(8):633-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377305. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of flunitrazepam as an oral hypnotic on 24-hour blood pressure in healthy volunteers.氟硝西泮作为口服催眠药对健康志愿者24小时血压的影响。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;74(8):995-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2466-9. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
2
Endoscopic treatment for esophageal varices complicated by Isaacs' syndrome involving difficulty with conventional sedation.内镜治疗食管静脉曲张合并Isaacs综合征伴常规镇静困难。
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;9(1):27-31. doi: 10.1007/s12328-016-0626-y. Epub 2016 Feb 10.