Robaux S, Coulibaly Y, Konaté B, Boileau S, Cornet C, Dautel G, Laxenaire M C, Bouaziz H
Service d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale, hôpitaux de ville, CHU de Nancy, 29, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 54035 Nancy cedex, France.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2003 Oct;22(8):691-6. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(03)00185-0.
The assessment of the impact of various analgesic regimens on postoperative pain at home, following emergency and ambulatory hand surgery.
Prospective comparative study of "before" and "after" groups by phone questionnaire on the first postoperative day.
All emergency and ambulatory surgery patients undergoing hand surgery in a specialist university hospital unit.
a) "Before" group (120 patients): analysis of current analgesic practice in the service (prescriptions by surgeon on duty), assessment of the incidence of pain scores with an intensity >/= 4 on a numerical score of 0 to 10, and identification of the most painful surgical interventions; b) formulation for these surgical interventions of multimodal analgesic protocols drown up by the anaesthetists; c) "After" group (51 patients): assessment of the efficacy of these analgesic protocols through comparison with the "before" group.
a) "Before" group: the total incidence of pain scores with an intensity >/= 4 was 42% and in the case of conditions involving a joint or sepsis, 88%. Dextropropoxyfen-paracetamol alone was prescribed in 66% of cases and was associated with a 48% analgesic failure rate. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were prescribed in 14% of cases, tramadol in 7% and a combination of drugs in 15%; b) "After" group: the incidence of pain scores with an intensity >/= 4 decreased to 21% in surgical interventions involving joints or sepsis (p < 0.001).
Multimodal analgesic regimens are more effective than free prescriptions. This study underlines the need to further educate surgeons in this area. Despite these written protocols, there remains a 21% incidence of pain at home on day one.
评估各种镇痛方案对急诊及门诊手部手术后患者在家中疼痛情况的影响。
术后第一天通过电话问卷对“术前”和“术后”两组进行前瞻性对比研究。
在一所专业大学医院科室接受手部手术的所有急诊及门诊手术患者。
a)“术前”组(120例患者):分析科室当前的镇痛做法(值班外科医生的处方),评估在0至10的数字评分中疼痛评分强度≥4的发生率,并确定最疼痛的手术干预措施;b)由麻醉师制定针对这些手术干预措施的多模式镇痛方案;c)“术后”组(51例患者):通过与“术前”组比较评估这些镇痛方案的疗效。
a)“术前”组:疼痛评分强度≥4的总发生率为42%,在涉及关节或脓毒症的情况下为88%。66%的病例单独开具右丙氧芬-对乙酰氨基酚,其镇痛失败率为48%。14%的病例开具非甾体抗炎药,7%开具曲马多,15%开具联合用药;b)“术后”组:在涉及关节或脓毒症的手术干预中,疼痛评分强度≥4的发生率降至21%(p<0.001)。
多模式镇痛方案比随意处方更有效。本研究强调有必要在该领域对外科医生进行进一步培训。尽管有这些书面方案,但术后第一天在家中仍有21%的疼痛发生率。