Miranda Danielle, Smith Scott D, Krueger Ronald R
Department of Refractive Surgery, Cole Eye Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2003 Oct;110(10):1931-4. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00786-3.
To compare flap thickness and reproducibility of four different types of microkeratomes during LASIK.
Retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative case series.
Four hundred ninety consecutive eyes underwent LASIK and were evaluated by measuring the central flap thickness by subtractive pachymetry.
All flaps were created using the Bausch & Lomb (Miami, FL) Hansatome 180 head, the Alcon (Fort Worth, TX) Summit Krumeich Barraquer Microkeratome 160 head, the Moria (Antony, France) Carriazo Barraquer (CB) 130 head, or the Moria M2 110 head.
The flap thickness measurements differed according to the microkeratome used and were 131+/-28 microm in 41 eyes (8.4%) with the Bausch & Lomb Hansatome 180 head, 162+/-21 microm in 127 eyes (25.9%) with the Alcon Summit Krumeich Barraquer Microkeratome (SKBM) 160 head, 157+/-40 microm in 65 eyes (13.3%) with the Moria CB 130 head, and 134+/-23 microm in 257 eyes (52.4%) with the Moria M2 110 head. The central flap thickness with the SKBM and Moria M2 was statistically significantly more reproducible than with the Moria CB (P< 0.0005). There is no correlation between flap thickness reproducibility and age, corneal thickness, or corneal keratometric values. However, considering all the microkeratomes, female gender had statistically significantly more variability than male gender (P<0.02).
Based on these results, the greatest predictability of flap thickness was seen with the SKBM and Moria M2 microkeratomes, which both use a second motor for advancement. The greatest variability, noted with the Moria CB, was likely due to the manual translation feature and places further importance on the safety of the second motor and automation when performing LASIK.
