Suppr超能文献

螺旋CT用于肾结石和输尿管结石:传统技术与低辐射剂量技术的比较

Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques.

作者信息

Heneghan Joan P, McGuire Keith A, Leder Richard A, DeLong David M, Yoshizumi Terry, Nelson Rendon C

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2003 Nov;229(2):575-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2292021261. Epub 2003 Oct 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) performed at reduced milliampere-second, and therefore at a reduced patient radiation dose, by using conventional unenhanced helical CT as the standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with acute flank pain who weighed less than 200 lb (90 kg) were prospectively recruited for this study. Conventional helical CT scans were obtained with patients in the prone position by using 5-mm-thick sections, 140 kVp, 135-208 mAs (mean, 160 mAs), and a pitch of 1.5 (single-detector row CT) or 0.75 (multi-detector row CT, 4 x 5-mm detector configuration). Conventional CT was immediately followed by low-dose scanning, whereby the tube current was reduced to 100 mA (mean, 76 mAs). All other technical parameters and anatomic coverage remained constant. Three independent readers who were blinded to patient identity interpreted the scans in random order. The observers noted the location, size, and number of calculi; secondary signs of obstruction; and other clinically relevant findings. High- and low-dose scans were compared by using paired t tests and the signed rank test.

RESULTS

Calculi were found in 33 (66%) patients; 25 (50%) had renal calculi and 19 (38%) had an obstructing ureteral calculus. The accuracy rates (averaged over the three readers) for determining the various findings on the low-dose scan compared with the high-dose scan were as follows: nephrolithiasis, 91%; ureterolithiasis, 94%; obstruction, 91%; and normal findings, 92%. When interpretations between readers were compared, agreement rates were 90%-95% for standard-dose scans and 90%-92% for reduced-dose scans (P >.5). Uncomplicated mild diverticulitis was found in three patients. No other clinically important abnormality was identified. A reduction in the tube current to 100 mA resulted in a dose reduction of 25% for multi-detector row CT and 42% for single-detector row CT.

CONCLUSION

In patients who weighed less than 200 lb, unenhanced helical CT performed at a reduced tube current of 100 mA, and therefore at a reduced patient dose, resulted in scans of high accuracy.

摘要

目的

以传统非增强螺旋CT为标准,确定在降低毫安秒(从而降低患者辐射剂量)条件下进行的非增强螺旋CT的准确性。

材料与方法

前瞻性招募了50例体重小于200磅(90千克)的急性胁腹痛患者进行本研究。患者俯卧位时进行传统螺旋CT扫描,层厚5毫米,管电压140 kVp,管电流135 - 208 mAs(平均160 mAs),螺距1.5(单排探测器CT)或0.75(多排探测器CT,4×5毫米探测器配置)。传统CT扫描后立即进行低剂量扫描,此时管电流降至100 mA(平均76 mAs)。所有其他技术参数和解剖覆盖范围保持不变。三位对患者身份不知情的独立阅片者按随机顺序解读扫描图像。观察者记录结石的位置、大小和数量;梗阻的间接征象;以及其他临床相关发现。通过配对t检验和符号秩检验比较高剂量和低剂量扫描结果。

结果

33例(66%)患者发现结石;25例(50%)有肾结石,19例(38%)有梗阻性输尿管结石。与高剂量扫描相比,低剂量扫描时确定各种发现的准确率(三位阅片者的平均值)如下:肾结石,91%;输尿管结石,94%;梗阻,91%;正常表现,92%。比较阅片者之间的解读结果,标准剂量扫描的一致率为90% - 95%,低剂量扫描为90% - 92%(P>.5)。3例患者发现单纯性轻度憩室炎。未发现其他具有临床重要意义的异常。管电流降至100 mA使多排探测器CT的剂量降低25%,单排探测器CT降低42%。

结论

在体重小于200磅的患者中,管电流降至100 mA进行的非增强螺旋CT扫描,从而降低了患者剂量,扫描结果具有较高准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验