Russo David P, Stoll Scott T, Shores Jay H
Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth-Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003 Sep;103(9):429-34.
Little empirical work has been done to examine how osteopathic medical students' attitudes toward osteopathic principles and practice (OPP) develop and evolve over the course of their medical education. A major obstacle to conducting this research is the absence of reliable and sensitive instruments to measure students' attitudes toward OPP. The purpose of this project is to develop a sensitive and reliable instrument to measure students' attitudes toward OPP. Face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted with osteopathic medical students, osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) residents, OMM undergraduate fellows, and three board-certified OMM specialists. These interviews were summarized in a 39-item instrument administered to 127 students at the completion of their core OMM rotation at the University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth-Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine. Factor analysis of student responses to the 39 candidate items yielded two interpretable factors. Factor 1 contained 24 items and accounted for 33% of the item response variance, and factor 2 contained four items and accounted for 5.6% of the item response variance. Based on these results, 14 of the original 39 statements were eliminated and the smaller second factor was dropped. Factor 1 contained items reflecting both positive and negative attitudes toward the application of OPP in patient care, the importance of OPP in medical education, and professional distinctiveness. One of the original 39 candidate items was returned to factor 1 because it was judged by the investigators to be consistent with the underlying construct of the scale and helped balance the number of forward-scored and reversed-scored items in the final instrument. Two internal consistency estimates of reliability were computed for the revised 25-item Attitudes Toward Osteopathic Principles and Practice Scale (ATOPPS): the Spearman-Brown unequal-length corrected coefficient alpha and the split-half reliability coefficients. Estimates for the split-half coefficients were .89 for part 1 and .87 for part 2. The Spearman-Brown coefficient alpha was .93, indicating substantial internal consistency. The 25-item ATOPPS seems to reflect a continuum of positive and negative attitudes toward OPP. This preliminary report documents reliability for the 25-item ATOPPS. With continued support for its construct validity, ATOPPS provides investigators with a reliable tool to assess the development of attitudes toward OPP.
很少有实证研究去考察整骨医学专业学生对整骨疗法原则与实践(OPP)的态度在其医学教育过程中是如何形成和演变的。开展这项研究的一个主要障碍是缺乏可靠且灵敏的工具来测量学生对OPP的态度。本项目的目的是开发一种灵敏且可靠的工具来测量学生对OPP的态度。研究人员对整骨医学专业学生、整骨手法医学(OMM)住院医师、OMM本科研究员以及三位获得委员会认证的OMM专家进行了面对面访谈和电话访谈。这些访谈内容被总结成一份包含39个条目的问卷,在德克萨斯沃思堡市北德克萨斯健康科学中心德州整骨医学院完成核心OMM轮转的127名学生中进行了施测。对学生对这39个候选条目的回答进行因素分析,得到了两个可解释的因素。因素1包含24个条目,占条目回答方差的33%,因素2包含4个条目,占条目回答方差的5.6%。基于这些结果,最初的39个陈述中有14个被剔除,较小的第二个因素也被舍弃。因素1包含的条目反映了对OPP在患者护理中的应用的积极和消极态度、OPP在医学教育中的重要性以及专业独特性。最初的39个候选条目中有一个被放回因素1,因为研究人员认为它与该量表的潜在结构一致,并且有助于平衡最终工具中正向计分和反向计分条目的数量。对修订后的25个条目的整骨疗法原则与实践态度量表(ATOPPS)计算了两种内部一致性信度估计值:斯皮尔曼 - 布朗不等长校正系数α和分半信度系数。分半系数的估计值在第1部分为0.89,在第2部分为0.87。斯皮尔曼 - 布朗系数α为0.93,表明具有较高的内部一致性。25个条目的ATOPPS似乎反映了对OPP的积极和消极态度的连续体。这份初步报告记录了25个条目的ATOPPS的信度。如果其结构效度能持续得到支持,ATOPPS将为研究人员提供一个可靠的工具来评估对OPP态度(的形成)发展情况。