Budowle Bruce, Allard Marc W, Wilson Mark R, Chakraborty Ranajit
Laboratory Division, FBI, Washington, DC 20535, USA.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2003;4:119-41. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110352.
Debate on the validity and reliability of scientific methods often arises in the courtroom. When the government (i.e., the prosecution) is the proponent of evidence, the defense is obliged to challenge its admissibility. Regardless, those who seek to use DNA typing methodologies to analyze forensic biological evidence have a responsibility to understand the technology and its applications so a proper foundation(s) for its use can be laid. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), an extranuclear genome, has certain features that make it desirable for forensics, namely, high copy number, lack of recombination, and matrilineal inheritance. mtDNA typing has become routine in forensic biology and is used to analyze old bones, teeth, hair shafts, and other biological samples where nuclear DNA content is low. To evaluate results obtained by sequencing the two hypervariable regions of the control region of the human mtDNA genome, one must consider the genetically related issues of nomenclature, reference population databases, heteroplasmy, paternal leakage, recombination, and, of course, interpretation of results. We describe the approaches, the impact some issues may have on interpretation of mtDNA analyses, and some issues raised in the courtroom.
关于科学方法的有效性和可靠性的争论常常在法庭上出现。当政府(即检方)作为证据的支持者时,辩方有义务对证据的可采性提出质疑。无论如何,那些试图使用DNA分型方法来分析法医物证的人有责任了解这项技术及其应用,以便为其使用奠定适当的基础。线粒体DNA(mtDNA)是一种核外基因组,具有某些使其适用于法医鉴定的特征,即高拷贝数、缺乏重组和母系遗传。mtDNA分型已成为法医生物学中的常规操作,用于分析陈旧骨骼、牙齿、毛干和其他核DNA含量较低的生物样本。为了评估通过对人类mtDNA基因组控制区的两个高变区进行测序所获得的结果,必须考虑命名法、参考人群数据库、异质性、父系渗漏、重组等遗传相关问题,当然还有结果的解释。我们描述了这些方法、一些问题可能对mtDNA分析解释产生的影响以及法庭上提出的一些问题。