Blankstein K R, Flett G L, Johnston M E
Department of Psychology, Erindale College, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Nov;48(6):749-59. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199211)48:6<749::aid-jclp2270480609>3.0.co;2-v.
Behavioral analytic methods were used to create a college student version of the Means Ends Problem Solving Procedure (MEPS). This instrument then was administered with measures of perceived problem-solving ability to depressed and nondepressed students to determine whether differences exist in both problem-solving ability and problem-solving appraisal. Analyses revealed that depressed subjects had more negative expectations and lower appraisals of their problem-solving ability. However, the groups did not differ in terms of the actual quality of their behavioral solutions to interpersonal, intrapersonal, and emotional problem situations. The results are interpreted as support for the role of cognitive factors in depression and problem-solving across a range of problem-solving situations.
行为分析方法被用于创建大学生版的手段-目的问题解决程序(MEPS)。然后,该工具与感知问题解决能力的测量一起施用于抑郁和非抑郁学生,以确定在问题解决能力和问题解决评估方面是否存在差异。分析表明,抑郁受试者对其问题解决能力有更多负面期望和更低评价。然而,两组在人际、个人内和情绪问题情境的行为解决方案的实际质量方面没有差异。这些结果被解释为支持认知因素在抑郁和一系列问题解决情境中的问题解决中的作用。