Suppr超能文献

无心双胎:微创治疗方式的系统评价

Acardiac twin: a systematic review of minimally invasive treatment modalities.

作者信息

Tan T Y T, Sepulveda W

机构信息

Centre for Fetal Care, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;22(4):409-19. doi: 10.1002/uog.224.

Abstract

This review of the literature aimed to determine pregnancy outcomes after minimally invasive treatment for occluding vascular supply to acardiac twins. A MEDLINE search was performed until 2002 using the terms 'acardiac', 'acardius', 'twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence' and 'chorangiopagus parasiticus' and 207 articles published in the English-language literature were identified. These articles and the corresponding cited references in English were reviewed. We identified 32 reports involving 74 cases of acardiac twin treated by minimally invasive techniques. Seventy one cases were included for analysis including 40 treated by cord occlusion and 31 by intrafetal ablation. Cord occlusion was first attempted by embolization (n = 5), cord ligation (n = 15), laser coagulation (n = 10), bipolar diathermy (n = 7) and monopolar diathermy (n = 3). Intrafetal ablation was performed by alcohol (n = 5), monopolar diathermy (n = 9), interstitial laser (n = 4) and radiofrequency (n = 13). The overall median gestational ages at treatment and delivery were 21 (range, 14-28) weeks and 36 (range, 19-42) weeks, respectively, with a median treatment-delivery interval of 13 (range, 0-25) weeks. The overall pump twin survival rate was 76% (n = 54). Intrafetal ablation was associated with later median gestational age at delivery (37 vs. 32 weeks, P = 0.04) and higher median treatment-delivery interval (16 vs. 9.5 weeks, P = 0.02) compared with cord occlusion techniques. It was also associated with a lower technical failure rate (13% vs. 35%, P = 0.03), lower rate of premature delivery or rupture of membranes before 32 weeks (23% vs. 58%, P = 0.003) and higher rate of clinical success (77% vs. 50%, P = 0.02) than cord occlusion techniques. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of outcome between the subgroups of fetoscopic- or ultrasound-guided cord occlusion techniques. This review suggests that intrafetal ablation is the treatment of choice for acardiac twins because it is simpler, safer and more effective when compared with the cord occlusion techniques.

摘要

本文献综述旨在确定对无心双胎闭塞血管供应进行微创治疗后的妊娠结局。使用“无心的”“无心畸胎”“双胎反向动脉灌注序列(TRAP序列)”和“寄生连体双胎”等检索词对MEDLINE进行检索,检索截至2002年,共识别出207篇发表在英文文献中的文章。对这些文章以及相应引用的英文参考文献进行了综述。我们识别出32篇报告,涉及74例采用微创技术治疗的无心双胎病例。纳入71例病例进行分析,其中40例采用脐带闭塞治疗,31例采用胎儿体内消融治疗。脐带闭塞首先尝试采用栓塞术(n = 5)、脐带结扎术(n = 15)、激光凝固术(n = 10)、双极透热法(n = 7)和单极透热法(n = 3)。胎儿体内消融采用乙醇(n = 5)、单极透热法(n = 9)、间质激光(n = 4)和射频(n = 13)。治疗时和分娩时的总体中位孕周分别为21周(范围14 - 28周)和36周(范围19 - 42周),治疗至分娩的中位间隔时间为13周(范围0 - 25周)。总体泵血儿存活率为76%(n = 54)。与脐带闭塞技术相比,胎儿体内消融与分娩时更高的中位孕周(37周对32周,P = 0.04)以及更长的中位治疗至分娩间隔时间(16周对9.5周,P = 0.02)相关。它还与更低的技术失败率(13%对35%,P = 0.03)、32周前更低的早产或胎膜破裂率(23%对58%,P = 0.003)以及更高的临床成功率(77%对50%,P = 0.02)相关。在胎儿镜引导或超声引导的脐带闭塞技术亚组之间,结局方面无统计学显著差异。本综述表明,胎儿体内消融是无心双胎的首选治疗方法,因为与脐带闭塞技术相比,它更简单、更安全且更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验