Palm A M, Kirkegaard U, Poulsen S
Municipal Dental Service for Children and Adolescents, Frederikssund, Denmark.
Pediatr Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec;26(6):481-4.
The purpose of this study was to compare the perception of pain and time of onset in relation to mandibular alveolar nerve block administered by a computerized anesthesia delivery system (ie, The Wand) and a traditional anesthesia system (ie, the syringe).
This study was conducted according to a split-mouth design, with both types of injections being given to all patients. Subjects consisted of 33 patients between 7 and 18 years of age requiring local anesthesia for dental restorations in both sides of the mandible. All patients were blindfolded, and the sound from the Wand machine was activated during both types of administration. Topical analgesic was placed in the area of the injection site in all cases. Pain ratings were obtained using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Time of onset was measured, from withdrawal of the needle to numbness of the lower lip was reported.
The computerized anesthesia delivery system resulted in significantly lower pain ratings than the traditional syringe. No difference could be found in time of onset between the 2 methods.
Mandibular alveolar block analgesia seems to be less painful when using The Wand than when using a traditional syringe.
本研究旨在比较使用计算机化麻醉输送系统(即The Wand)和传统麻醉系统(即注射器)进行下颌牙槽神经阻滞时的疼痛感知和起效时间。
本研究采用双侧对照设计,对所有患者进行两种类型的注射。研究对象为33例年龄在7至18岁之间、需要在下颌两侧进行牙齿修复局部麻醉的患者。所有患者均被蒙上眼睛,在两种给药过程中均启动The Wand机器的声音。所有病例均在注射部位涂抹局部镇痛药。使用10分视觉模拟量表(VAS)获得疼痛评分。测量起效时间,记录从拔针到下唇麻木的时间。
计算机化麻醉输送系统导致的疼痛评分明显低于传统注射器。两种方法在起效时间上没有差异。
使用The Wand进行下颌牙槽阻滞镇痛似乎比使用传统注射器时疼痛更小。