Suppr超能文献

铒激光预备后在恒磨牙上应用窝沟封闭剂的微渗漏比较研究

Comparative study of microleakage of a pit and fissure sealant placed after preparation by Er:YAG laser in permanent molars.

作者信息

Lupi-Pegurier Laurence, Bertrand Marie France, Muller-Bolla Michele, Rocca Jean Paul, Bolla Marc

机构信息

University Hospital, Department of Public Health, Sophia Antipolis, France.

出版信息

J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 May-Aug;70(2):134-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage of a pit and fissure sealant on enamel treated with a laser, with and without etching.

METHODS

Sixty non-carious extracted molars were randomly assigned to 2 groups. For both groups, in the mesial halves, the fissures were widened mechanically with a bur and etched for 15 seconds. In group 1, the distal half was prepared with a laser alone; in group 2, a laser was followed by etching. Then the sealant was applied on all teeth.

RESULTS

Laser alone showed the highest number of specimens with microleakage (63%) (P < .02) and the highest mean of microleakage (0.76 mm vs 0.12 mm, 0.17 mm, and 0.18 mm; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was noted between the 2 types of enamel preparation when etching was performed. Laser irradiation did not eliminate the need for etching the enamel surface before applying the sealant.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估在有或没有酸蚀的情况下,激光处理过的牙釉质上窝沟封闭剂的微渗漏情况。

方法

将60颗非龋性拔除磨牙随机分为2组。两组的近中半侧,均用裂钻机械扩宽裂隙并酸蚀15秒。第1组,远中半侧仅用激光处理;第2组,先用激光处理,然后进行酸蚀。然后在所有牙齿上应用封闭剂。

结果

仅用激光处理的标本中出现微渗漏的数量最多(63%)(P < 0.02),且微渗漏的平均程度最高(0.76毫米,而其他分别为0.12毫米、0.17毫米和0.18毫米;P < 0.01)。

结论

进行酸蚀时,两种牙釉质处理方式之间未观察到显著差异。在应用封闭剂之前,激光照射并不能消除酸蚀牙釉质表面的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验