Lupi-Pegurier Laurence, Bertrand Marie France, Muller-Bolla Michele, Rocca Jean Paul, Bolla Marc
University Hospital, Department of Public Health, Sophia Antipolis, France.
J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 May-Aug;70(2):134-8.
The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage of a pit and fissure sealant on enamel treated with a laser, with and without etching.
Sixty non-carious extracted molars were randomly assigned to 2 groups. For both groups, in the mesial halves, the fissures were widened mechanically with a bur and etched for 15 seconds. In group 1, the distal half was prepared with a laser alone; in group 2, a laser was followed by etching. Then the sealant was applied on all teeth.
Laser alone showed the highest number of specimens with microleakage (63%) (P < .02) and the highest mean of microleakage (0.76 mm vs 0.12 mm, 0.17 mm, and 0.18 mm; P < .01).
No significant difference was noted between the 2 types of enamel preparation when etching was performed. Laser irradiation did not eliminate the need for etching the enamel surface before applying the sealant.
本研究的目的是评估在有或没有酸蚀的情况下,激光处理过的牙釉质上窝沟封闭剂的微渗漏情况。
将60颗非龋性拔除磨牙随机分为2组。两组的近中半侧,均用裂钻机械扩宽裂隙并酸蚀15秒。第1组,远中半侧仅用激光处理;第2组,先用激光处理,然后进行酸蚀。然后在所有牙齿上应用封闭剂。
仅用激光处理的标本中出现微渗漏的数量最多(63%)(P < 0.02),且微渗漏的平均程度最高(0.76毫米,而其他分别为0.12毫米、0.17毫米和0.18毫米;P < 0.01)。
进行酸蚀时,两种牙釉质处理方式之间未观察到显著差异。在应用封闭剂之前,激光照射并不能消除酸蚀牙釉质表面的必要性。