• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高速硬质合金车针、铒激光和空气磨蚀制备的乳磨牙中可流动复合树脂修复体边缘微渗漏的比较。

Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.

作者信息

Borsatto Maria Cristina, Corona Silmara Aparecida Milori, Chinelatti Michelle Alexandra, Ramos Renata Pereira, de Sá Rocha Renata Andréa Salvitti, Pecora Jesus Djalma, Palma-Dibb Regina Guenka

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Clinics, Social and Preventive Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Dent Child (Chic). 2006 May-Aug;73(2):122-6.

PMID:16948375
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess in vitro the influence of 3 cavity preparation devices (carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion) on the microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary teeth.

METHODS

Fifteen primary second molars were selected, and Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal/lingual surfaces, being assigned to 3 groups (n= 10). Group 1 (control) was prepared using a high-speed handpiece and was acid etched. Group 2 was prepared and treated with a Er:YAG laser (400mJ/4Hz and 80mJ/4Hz, respectively) and was acid etched. Group 3 was prepared and treated with an air abrasion system and was acid etched. Cavities were restored and stored for 7 days. Restorations were polished, thermocycled, immersed in 0.2% rhodamine B, sectioned, and analyzed for leakage.

RESULTS

Er:YAG laser-prepared cavities showed the highest degree of infiltration. The performance of the air abrasion device was comparable to that of the high-speed handpiece.

CONCLUSION

It may be concluded that the method of cavity preparation affected the microleakage of Class V cavities restored with flowable composite in primary teeth.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在体外评估3种窝洞制备器械(车针、铒钇铝石榴石激光和空气喷砂)对乳牙流动复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。

方法

选取15颗乳牙第二磨牙,在颊/舌面制备V类洞,分为3组(每组n = 10)。第1组(对照组)使用高速手机制备窝洞并进行酸蚀。第2组使用铒钇铝石榴石激光(分别为400mJ/4Hz和80mJ/4Hz)制备并处理窝洞,然后进行酸蚀。第3组使用空气喷砂系统制备并处理窝洞,接着进行酸蚀。窝洞修复后保存7天。修复体进行抛光、热循环处理,浸泡在0.2%的罗丹明B中,切片并分析渗漏情况。

结果

铒钇铝石榴石激光制备的窝洞显示出最高的渗透程度。空气喷砂器械的性能与高速手机相当。

结论

可以得出结论,窝洞制备方法影响了乳牙用流动复合树脂修复的V类洞的微渗漏。

相似文献

1
Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.高速硬质合金车针、铒激光和空气磨蚀制备的乳磨牙中可流动复合树脂修复体边缘微渗漏的比较。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2006 May-Aug;73(2):122-6.
2
Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.使用车针、空气喷砂或铒钇铝石榴石激光预备后V类树脂复合体修复体的微渗漏
Oper Dent. 2001 Sep-Oct;26(5):491-7.
3
Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.窝洞预备器械:对V类树脂基复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响
Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):157-62.
4
Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.铒钇铝石榴石激光能量对Ⅴ类树脂基复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。
Am J Dent. 2000 Oct;13(5):280-4.
5
Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.使用牙钻或空气磨蚀技术预备乳牙后复合树脂修复体的微渗漏情况。
Oper Dent. 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):164-9.
6
Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.铒铬:钇-钪-镓石榴石激光辐射制备的颈部洞复合树脂修复体的微渗漏
Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53(2):172-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00028.x.
7
Chlorhexidine's effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.洗必泰对铒钇铝石榴石激光制备窝洞后复合树脂修复体封闭能力的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Jul 1;8(5):26-33.
8
Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.不同粘结系统在Er,Cr:YSGG激光和车针制备的V类洞中的微渗漏研究
Gen Dent. 2007 Jan-Feb;55(1):27-32.
9
The effect of tooth preparation on microleakage behavior.
Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):526-33.
10
Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.使用空气磨蚀和复合树脂修复对恒牙进行新型I类洞制备。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999 Spring;23(3):201-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Er,Cr:YSGG reduce the microleakage of restorations when used for cavity preparation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Er,Cr:YSGG 激光用于牙体预备时是否能减少修复体的微渗漏?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01252-x.
2
Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary canine teeth prepared with high-speed diamond bur, Er:YAG laser and Er,Cr:YSGG laser.高速金刚石车针、铒激光和铒铬钇镓石榴石激光预备的乳尖牙中流动复合树脂修复体边缘微渗漏的比较
Laser Ther. 2017 Sep 30;26(3):195-202. doi: 10.5978/islsm.17-OR-15.
3
Nanoleakage of Class V Resin Restorations Using Two Nanofilled Adhesive Systems.
使用两种纳米填充粘结系统的V类树脂修复体的微渗漏
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Jul;7(7):6-11.
4
Comparison of Micro-Leakage from Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations in Cavities Prepared by Er:YAG (Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet) Laser and Conventional Method in Primary Teeth.铒激光与传统方法制备乳牙窝洞后树脂改性玻璃离子修复体微渗漏的比较
J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Fall;5(4):183-7.
5
Comparison of Marginal Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restorations in Primary Molars Prepared by Chemo-mechanical Caries Removal (CMCR), Erbium: Yttrium Aluminum-Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser and Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART).通过化学机械去龋(CMCR)、铒:钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光和非创伤性修复技术(ART)制备的乳牙玻璃离子修复体边缘微渗漏的比较。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 May;6(2):75-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1193. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
6
Assessment of Tooth Preparation via Er:YAG Laser and Bur on Microleakage of Dentin Adhesives.通过铒钇铝石榴石激光和车针进行牙体预备对牙本质黏结剂微渗漏的评估
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Mar;11(2):172-8. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
7
Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.Er:YAG 激光与牙钻制备的乳牙窝洞微渗漏与不同粘接修复材料修复的比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Nov;28(6):1453-60. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1222-0. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
8
Comparison of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth Prepared by Er: YAG Laser and the Conventional Method.铒激光与传统方法制备的乳牙玻璃离子修复体微渗漏的比较
J Dent (Tehran). 2012 Summer;9(3):215-20. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
9
The effect of cutting efficacy of diamond burs on microleakage of class v resin composite restorations using total etch and self etch adhesive systems.使用全酸蚀和自酸蚀粘结系统时,金刚石车针切割效能对Ⅴ类树脂复合体修复体微渗漏的影响。
J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Fall;7(4):218-25. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
10
Laser restorative dentistry in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的激光修复牙科
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011 Apr;12(2):68-78. doi: 10.1007/BF03262782.