• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种可填充树脂基复合材料的两年临床评估

Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite.

作者信息

Türkün L Sebnem, Türkün Murat, Ozata Ferit

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ege University, School of Dentistry, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Sep;134(9):1205-12. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0355.

DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0355
PMID:14528992
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Packable resin-based composites were introduced in 1998, but few clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate them. The authors conducted a clinical study to determine the two-year performance of SureFil (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) packable posterior resin-based composite in Class I and II restorations.

METHODS

An operator (L.S.T.) restored 55 cavities in 36 patients (16 Class I restorations and 39 Class II restorations). After cavity preparation, she etched the enamel with 34 percent phosphoric acid, applied Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH) to dentin and etched enamel for 20 seconds and then cured it for 20 seconds. She restored the cavity using 3- to 5-millimeter increments of SureFil. Independent examiners assessed the restorations after placement and at six months, one year and two years for color matching, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, surface texture, anatomical form and postoperative sensitivity, using the Ryge criteria.

RESULTS

The authors assessed the changes in the parameters during the two-year period using a software program with Friedman test analysis with a Bonferroni adjustment at significant level of P = .05. At baseline, 31 restorations were graded as Bravo for color match. At the six-month and one-year recall periods (n = 55), 53 restorations remained unchanged. Two restorations from the same patient fell out after one month. After two years (n = 50), there were five Bravos for surface staining and three for marginal adaptation (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

After two years of clinical service, SureFil packable resin-based composite had a success rate of 96 percent, and the authors considered it successful in Class I and II restorations.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

SureFil packable resin-based composite can be successful in clinical situations with limited-sized cavities and proper application of restorative techniques.

摘要

背景

可压实树脂基复合材料于1998年推出,但很少有临床研究对其进行评估。作者开展了一项临床研究,以确定SureFil(德国康斯坦茨登士柏德特雷有限公司)可压实后牙树脂基复合材料在Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类修复体中的两年性能。

方法

一名操作人员(L.S.T.)为36例患者的55个窝洞进行修复(16个Ⅰ类修复体和39个Ⅱ类修复体)。窝洞预备后,她用34%的磷酸酸蚀釉质,将Prime & Bond NT(登士柏德特雷有限公司)涂于牙本质和酸蚀后的釉质上20秒,然后光照固化20秒。她使用3至5毫米厚的SureFil逐层压实修复窝洞。独立检查人员在修复体就位后、6个月、1年和2年时,依据Ryge标准对修复体的颜色匹配、边缘变色、边缘适合性、继发龋、表面质地、外形和术后敏感性进行评估。

结果

作者使用一款软件程序,采用Friedman检验分析并在显著水平P = 0.05时进行Bonferroni校正,评估两年期间各项参数的变化。基线时,31个修复体的颜色匹配被评为优。在6个月和1年的复查期(n = 55),53个修复体保持不变。同一患者的两个修复体在1个月后脱落。两年后(n = 50),有5个修复体表面染色为优,3个边缘适合性为优(P < 0.05)。

结论

经过两年的临床应用,SureFil可压实树脂基复合材料的成功率为96%,作者认为它在Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类修复中是成功 的。

临床意义

SureFil可压实树脂基复合材料在窝洞大小有限且修复技术应用得当的临床情况下可以取得成功。

相似文献

1
Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite.一种可填充树脂基复合材料的两年临床评估
J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Sep;134(9):1205-12. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0355.
2
Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.可压实型和传统混合型树脂基复合材料用于恒牙后牙修复的临床评价:12个月的结果
J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1581-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0103.
3
Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.一种可填充树脂复合材料3年的临床性能。
Quintessence Int. 2005 May;36(5):365-72.
4
Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years.可填充型与传统混合型后牙树脂基复合材料的临床评估:3.5年随访结果
J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Nov;136(11):1533-40. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0083.
5
Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.可填充复合树脂修复体的六年临床评估
Oper Dent. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):11-7. doi: 10.2341/08-48.
6
Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques.两种技术下可压实型纳米复合树脂用于临床 2 年的评估
J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Mar;141(3):319-29. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0166.
7
Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.微混合、可压实和纳米填充树脂复合材料在 I 类修复体中 18 个月的临床评估。
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Jul;37(7):532-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02073.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
8
Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.使用全酸蚀技术放置的树脂基复合树脂后牙修复体的四年临床评估。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13(1):50-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00251.x.
9
A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report.可填充型和微混合树脂复合材料修复体的临床评估:一年期报告
Quintessence Int. 2005 Jan;36(1):41-8.
10
Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: a five-year follow-up.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Apr;140(4):447-54. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0194.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Posterior Class II Composite Restoration Location and Techniques on Marginal Sealing.后牙二类复合树脂修复的位置和技术对边缘封闭的影响
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jan 17;13(1):39. doi: 10.3390/dj13010039.
2
Two-year evaluation of a nano-hybrid and a bulk-fill resin composite: a randomized, double-blind split-mouth clinical study.纳米混合树脂复合材料和大块充填树脂复合材料的两年评估:一项随机、双盲、半口对照临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 11;28(4):208. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05592-8.
3
Two-year clinical performance of dual- and light-cure bulk-fill resin composites in Class ӀӀ restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
两种双固化和轻化学光固化型通用型树脂在后牙Ⅰ类洞修复中两年的临床性能:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Feb 7;28(2):138. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05538-0.
4
Neurotic personality trait as a predictor in the prognosis of composite restorations: A 24-month clinical follow up study.神经质人格特质作为复合修复预后的预测因素:一项为期 24 个月的临床随访研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 25;11(1):17179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96229-3.
5
Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities.后牙复合树脂QuiXfil用于I类和II类洞的随机对照临床试验三年结果
Clin Oral Investig. 2009 Sep;13(3):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-008-0233-5. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
6
Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up.两种可填充型后牙复合树脂的临床评估:两年随访
Clin Oral Investig. 2006 Sep;10(3):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0059-y. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
7
Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite.纳米填料与细颗粒混合树脂复合材料的两年临床性能
Clin Oral Investig. 2006 Jun;10(2):119-25. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0041-8. Epub 2006 Mar 23.