Kiremitci Arlin, Alpaslan Tugba, Gurgan Sevil
Hacettepe University, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.
Oper Dent. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):11-7. doi: 10.2341/08-48.
For decades, resin composites have been used with increasing frequency as posterior restorative materials, because of the demand for aesthetic restoration. This study evaluated the six-year clinical performance of Filtek P60 (3M ESPE) packable composite restorations in combination with a one-bottle etch and rinse adhesive, Single Bond (3M ESPE), in Class II restorations.
A total of 47 restorations were placed in the Class II cavity preparations (27 premolars and 20 molars) of 33 patients (22 female/11 male; mean age 34) by the same operator. The restorations were evaluated by two examiners at baseline and 1, 2, 3 and 6 years according to the method developed by Ryge, which also is known as the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The following characteristics were observed: marginal adaptation, anatomical form, surface texture, marginal discoloration, surface staining, post-operative sensitivity and secondary caries. The Chi-square and Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni adjustment were used for statistical analysis (p = 0.05).
All the restorations received Alpha scores at baseline assessment, except for one restoration, which showed post-operative sensitivity. At the three-year recall examination, two patients, with a total of three restorations, were not included. From baseline to three years, only two of the 44 restorations changed from Alpha to Bravo, for numerous reasons. At the six-year recall, 44 restorations were available for examination. The majority of restorations exhibited Alpha or Bravo scores for the evaluated criteria. No significant differences were found for any of the clinical criteria (p > 0.05). Only two restorations needed to be repaired due to caries that began independently from the restorations. Three or four restorations showed slight surface staining and marginal discoloration.
The clinical performance of the posterior composite restorations that were evaluated was acceptable after six years of service.
几十年来,由于美学修复的需求,树脂复合材料作为后牙修复材料的使用频率越来越高。本研究评估了Filtek P60(3M ESPE)可压实复合树脂修复体与单瓶蚀刻冲洗粘结剂Single Bond(3M ESPE)联合用于Ⅱ类洞修复的六年临床性能。
由同一名操作者在33例患者(22例女性/11例男性;平均年龄34岁)的Ⅱ类洞预备体(27颗前磨牙和20颗磨牙)中放置了总共47个修复体。根据Ryge制定的方法(也称为美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)标准),由两名检查者在基线以及1、2、3和6年时对修复体进行评估。观察以下特征:边缘适合性、解剖形态、表面质地、边缘变色、表面染色、术后敏感性和继发龋。采用经Bonferroni校正的卡方检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析(p = 0.05)。
除一个修复体表现出术后敏感性外,所有修复体在基线评估时均获得Alpha评分。在三年的复查中,两名患者的总共三个修复体未纳入。从基线到三年,44个修复体中只有两个因多种原因从Alpha变为Bravo。在六年的复查中,有44个修复体可供检查。大多数修复体在评估标准中表现为Alpha或Bravo评分。任何临床标准均未发现显著差异(p > 0.05)。只有两个修复体因独立于修复体开始的龋坏而需要修复。三到四个修复体显示出轻微的表面染色和边缘变色。
所评估的后牙复合树脂修复体在使用六年后的临床性能是可接受的。