Suppr超能文献

Do Asian women have less pelvic organ mobility than Caucasians?

作者信息

Dietz H P

机构信息

Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Oct;14(4):250-3; discussion 253. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1073-0. Epub 2003 Aug 27.

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have postulated racial differences in the incidence and prevalence of pelvic floor disorders. There are anecdotal data from cadaver dissections suggesting that Asian women benefit from stronger pelvic support structures. A prospective observational clinical study was conducted in order to test for differences in pelvic organ support in 200 nulliparous pregnant women. Assessment included translabial ultrasound, documenting the position of the pelvic organs and mobility on Valsalva relative to the inferoposterior symphyseal margin. The largest ethnic groups were Asian ( n=16) and Caucasian women ( n=161). On comparing the groups, both antepartum and postpartum analyses showed significantly less pelvic organ mobility in Asians. This was true for virtually all parameters of organ mobility and both anterior ( P=0.002 antepartum, P=0.009 postpartum) and posterior compartments ( P=0.04 antepartum, P=0.02 postpartum). No significant differences were detected for cervical mobility. It was concluded that Asian women seem to show less mobility of the anterior and posterior vaginal compartments than Caucasians.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验