Martinez-Trujillo Julio C, Klier Eliana M, Wang Hongying, Crawford J Douglas
Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Oct;90(4):2770-6. doi: 10.1152/jn.00330.2003.
Most of what we know about the neural control of gaze comes from experiments in head-fixed animals, but several "head-free" studies have suggested that fixing the head dramatically alters the apparent gaze command. We directly investigated this issue by quantitatively comparing head-fixed and head-free gaze trajectories evoked by electrically stimulating 52 sites in the superior colliculus (SC) of two monkeys and 23 sites in the supplementary eye fields (SEF) of two other monkeys. We found that head movements made a significant contribution to gaze shifts evoked from both neural structures. In the majority of the stimulated sites, average gaze amplitude was significantly larger and individual gaze trajectories were significantly less convergent in space with the head free to move. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that head-fixed stimulation only reveals the oculomotor component of the gaze shift, not the true, planned goal of the movement. One implication of this finding is that when comparing stimulation data against popular gaze control models, freeing the head shifts the apparent coding of gaze away from a "spatial code" toward a simpler visual model in the SC and toward an eye-centered or fixed-vector model representation in the SEF.
我们对注视神经控制的大部分了解都来自对头部固定动物的实验,但一些“无头部”研究表明,固定头部会显著改变明显的注视指令。我们通过定量比较两只猴子上丘(SC)中52个位点和另外两只猴子辅助眼区(SEF)中23个位点电刺激所诱发的头部固定和无头部注视轨迹,直接研究了这个问题。我们发现头部运动对这两种神经结构诱发的注视转移有显著贡献。在大多数受刺激位点,平均注视幅度显著更大,并且当头部可以自由移动时,个体注视轨迹在空间上的收敛性显著降低。我们的结果与以下假设一致:头部固定刺激仅揭示了注视转移的眼球运动成分,而非运动的真正计划目标。这一发现的一个含义是,当将刺激数据与流行的注视控制模型进行比较时,放开头部会使注视的明显编码从“空间编码”转向SC中更简单的视觉模型,以及SEF中以眼睛为中心或固定向量模型表示。