Suppr超能文献

经皮气管切开术——特殊注意事项。

Percutaneous tracheostomy--special considerations.

作者信息

Ernst Armin, Critchlow Jonathan

机构信息

Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Clin Chest Med. 2003 Sep;24(3):409-12. doi: 10.1016/s0272-5231(03)00045-5.

Abstract

Percutaneous tracheostomy is safe and highly effective in well-trained hands in establishing a long-term artificial airway. Most alleged contraindications and some suggestions on how the procedures should be performed likely stem from early trials when only "perfect candidates" were chosen. Most of those contraindications should not be viewed as prohibitions, but as suggestions related to the skill level and training of the operator. We have used this technique in many situations where the small incision and tamponading effect of the tracheostomy tube has been quite beneficial, in selected patients with coagulapathies and severe venous congestion from superior cava syndromes as well as thyroid cancers, and in whom operative approaches would have been difficult. Knowing one's level of expertise and comfort in choosing and rejecting patients and procedures accordingly is the key to keeping PT a procedure with an excellent safety record. As the experience with PT grows, more and more perceived contraindications will disappear. Studies will address the role of PT in children and as a means of establishing emergent airway access. Also, the exact coagulation limits will need to be established. Few contraindications will most likely remain absolute, such as active infections over the proposed entry site, uncontrollable bleeding disorders and excessive ventilatory and oxygenation requirements. In our institution, taking into account these absolute contraindications, fewer than 5% of patients in need of a tracheostomy in the intensive care unit will undergo a primary open procedure.

摘要

在训练有素的人员操作下,经皮气管切开术在建立长期人工气道方面既安全又高效。大多数所谓的禁忌症以及关于该操作应如何进行的一些建议,可能源于早期试验,当时只选择了“完美的候选人”。这些禁忌症中的大多数不应被视为禁忌,而应被视为与操作者技术水平和培训相关的建议。我们在许多情况下都使用了这项技术,气管切开管的小切口和填塞效果非常有益,这些情况包括选定的患有凝血障碍、上腔静脉综合征以及甲状腺癌导致严重静脉淤血且手术入路困难的患者。根据自身专业水平和舒适度来选择和拒绝患者及相应操作,是使经皮气管切开术保持出色安全记录的关键。随着经皮气管切开术经验的积累,越来越多被认为的禁忌症将会消失。研究将探讨经皮气管切开术在儿童中的作用以及作为建立紧急气道通路的一种手段。此外,还需要确定确切的凝血限度。极少数禁忌症很可能仍将是绝对禁忌,例如拟穿刺部位存在活动性感染、无法控制的出血性疾病以及过高的通气和氧合需求。在我们机构,考虑到这些绝对禁忌症,重症监护病房中需要气管切开术的患者中,不到5%会接受一期开放手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验