Neri M, Milano A, Laterza F, Di Bonaventura G, Piccolomini R, Caldarella M P, Balatsinou C, Lapenna D, Cuccurullo F
Department of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, Section of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Centre of Excellence on Ageing, Università Gabriele D'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Oct 15;18(8):821-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01757.x.
The resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics has been advocated as a major cause of treatment failure, and antimicrobial sensitivity testing has been proposed to improve efficacy; however, its role before first-line therapy has not been investigated in detail.
To assess whether antimicrobial sensitivity testing improves the eradication rate of first-line anti-Helicobacter treatments and to compare the effectiveness of ranitidine bismuth citrate and omeprazole in the presence of H. pylori resistance to antibiotics.
Two hundred and forty-two patients were assigned to either empirical or antimicrobial sensitivity testing-based treatment; within each group, subjects were further randomized to receive ranitidine bismuth citrate, 400 mg b.d., tinidazole, 500 mg b.d., and clarithromycin, 500 mg b.d., or omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin, 500 mg b.d., and amoxicillin, 1 g b.d., for 1 week, with substitution of the resistant antibiotic in the antimicrobial sensitivity testing-based treatment group.
Eradication rates were 67% [confidence interval (CI), 55-79%] in the empirical treatment group and 76% (CI, 65-87%) in the antimicrobial sensitivity testing-based group (P=N.S.). The overall success rate was 60% (CI, 51-69%) with omeprazole and 82% (CI, 73-91%) with ranitidine bismuth citrate (P<0.03); the latter overcame antibiotic resistance in 12 of 15 strains vs. zero of eight strains by omeprazole.
Antimicrobial sensitivity testing before first-line treatment does not improve the eradication rate, which is greater when ranitidine bismuth citrate is included in the treatment.
幽门螺杆菌对抗生素的耐药性被认为是治疗失败的主要原因,有人提议进行抗菌药敏试验以提高疗效;然而,其在一线治疗前的作用尚未得到详细研究。
评估抗菌药敏试验是否能提高一线抗幽门螺杆菌治疗的根除率,并比较在幽门螺杆菌对抗生素耐药的情况下,雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋和奥美拉唑的有效性。
242例患者被分配接受经验性治疗或基于抗菌药敏试验的治疗;在每组中,受试者进一步随机接受雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋,每日400mg,替硝唑,每日500mg,克拉霉素,每日500mg,或奥美拉唑,每日20mg,克拉霉素,每日500mg,阿莫西林,每日1g,治疗1周,在基于抗菌药敏试验的治疗组中替换耐药抗生素。
经验性治疗组的根除率为67%[置信区间(CI),55 - 79%],基于抗菌药敏试验的治疗组为76%(CI,65 - 87%)(P = 无显著性差异)。使用奥美拉唑时总体成功率为60%(CI,51 - 69%),使用雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋时为82%(CI,73 - 91%)(P < 0.03);后者在15株菌株中的12株中克服了抗生素耐药性,而奥美拉唑在8株菌株中无一例克服。
一线治疗前的抗菌药敏试验不能提高根除率,当治疗中包含雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋时根除率更高。