Hyer L, Davis H, Woods G, Albrecht J W, Boudewyns P
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30910.
Psychol Rep. 1992 Dec;71(3 Pt 1):867-79. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3.867.
This study addressed two issues, the interrelationship between the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) and the Millon II (MCMI-II) and the value of the new personality scales, Aggressive and Self-defeating, in a sample with diagnoses of combat-related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. 100 confirmed cases of combat-related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder were given a battery of measures including both Millon inventories and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (basic scales and selected subscales). They were rated on discharge status during a structured treatment program. Basic treatment and background information were also obtained. Analysis showed scores on the MCMI-II scales were higher but generally reflective of MCMI scales and that the Self-defeating personality style tends to be reflective of greater psychopathology, suicidal problems, treatment/disposition difficulties, overreporting of symptoms, and intensity of problems. Discussion encouraged the use of the MCMI-II with special emphasis given to the Self-defeating style in this group with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
本研究探讨了两个问题,即米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)与米隆第二版问卷(MCMI-II)之间的相互关系,以及新的人格量表“攻击性”和“自我挫败性”在确诊为与战斗相关的创伤后应激障碍样本中的价值。100例确诊为与战斗相关的创伤后应激障碍患者接受了一系列测评,包括米隆问卷和明尼苏达多相人格问卷(基本量表和选定的分量表)。他们在一个结构化治疗项目中根据出院状态进行评分。还获取了基本治疗和背景信息。分析表明,MCMI-II量表的得分更高,但总体上反映了MCMI量表的情况,且自我挫败性人格风格往往反映出更严重的精神病理学、自杀问题、治疗/处置困难、症状过度报告以及问题的严重程度。讨论鼓励使用MCMI-II,并特别强调该创伤后应激障碍群体中的自我挫败风格。