Munley P H, Bains D S, Bloem W D, Busby R M, Pendziszewski S
Psychology Service, VA Medical Center, Battle Creek, MI 49016, USA.
Psychol Rep. 1995 Jun;76(3 Pt 1):939-44. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.3.939.
This study investigated the MCMI-II profile characteristics of 39 veterans diagnosed with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Characteristics of the mean group profile were similar to prior findings reported in the literature on the MCMI and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder with highest mean elevations found on the Avoidant, Passive-Aggressive, Schizoid, and Antisocial basic personality scales, the Borderline and Schizotypal pathological personality scales, and with elevations on the Anxiety, Dysthymia, Alcohol Dependence, Drug Dependence, and Major Depression clinical syndrome scales. A multivariate analysis of variance comparing the group with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder with a non-PTSD comparison group of 39 on the basic personality, pathological personality, and the clinical syndrome scales of the MCMI-II was not statistically significant. Nonetheless, univariate analyses of variance comparing the two groups on the individual modifier scales and the individual personality and clinical syndrome scales of the MCMI-II using a Bonferroni adjusted probability indicated significant differences on the Desirability and Histrionic scales. Response-style bias as a possible factor in MCMI-II profiles for the group with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder is also discussed.
本研究调查了39名被诊断患有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人的MCMI-II剖面图特征。平均组剖面图的特征与先前文献中关于MCMI和创伤后应激障碍的研究结果相似，在回避型、被动攻击型、分裂样和反社会基本人格量表、边缘型和分裂型病理人格量表上平均得分最高，在焦虑、心境恶劣、酒精依赖、药物依赖和重度抑郁临床综合征量表上也有得分升高。在MCMI-II的基本人格、病理人格和临床综合征量表上，将创伤后应激障碍组与39名非创伤后应激障碍对照组进行多变量方差分析，结果无统计学意义。尽管如此，使用Bonferroni调整概率对MCMI-II的个体修饰量表以及个体人格和临床综合征量表上的两组进行单变量方差分析，结果显示在愿望量表和表演量表上存在显著差异。还讨论了反应风格偏差作为创伤后应激障碍组MCMI-II剖面图中一个可能因素的情况。
