Zöllner C, Karnahl T
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1977 Nov;56(11):925-31.
At seven normally hearing test persons the early acoustically evoked potentials were registered using monaural, binaural and contralateral click-stimulation with a repetition-rate of 10/sec at the intensities of 90 and 70 dB SPL. In comparison to the monaural stimulation the binaural stimulation yields in the mean no significant alteration of the potentials I, II and III at both intensities. The mean enlargement of potential IV by binaural stimulation amounts to about 40% and is highly significant, but this advantage does not apply always to everybody: the factor of magnification of potential IV covers the range from one to two. The average increase of 66% at potential V is weakly significant for the intensity of 90 dB SPL. As expected from the results of contralateral stimulation the registrations at patients suffering from unilateral hearing impairment show on both sides the potential's threshold of the better hearing ear when stimulating binaurally; therefore you cannot determine the better cochlea. In addition to this fact the binaural stimulation of patients suffering from an acoustic neuroma removes the diagnostically important tool to recognize differences between the two sides. These findings are demonstrated by examples. Since it is impossible to predict an increase of the amplitude in the individual case and since there are serious diagnostic disadvantages, we don't deem advisable a binaural stimulation.
对7名听力正常的受试者,分别使用单耳、双耳和对侧短声刺激,以10次/秒的重复率,在90dB SPL和70dB SPL强度下记录早期听觉诱发电位。与单耳刺激相比,双耳刺激在两种强度下,电位I、II和III平均无显著变化。双耳刺激使电位IV平均增大约40%,具有高度显著性,但这种优势并非对每个人都适用:电位IV的放大倍数在1到2之间。在90dB SPL强度下,电位V平均增加66%,具有微弱显著性。正如对侧刺激的结果所预期的那样,对单侧听力障碍患者进行双耳刺激时,记录显示在刺激双耳时,两侧均显示较好听力耳的电位阈值;因此无法确定较好的耳蜗。除此之外,对听神经瘤患者进行双耳刺激会消除识别两侧差异这一重要的诊断工具。这些发现通过实例进行了说明。由于无法在个体病例中预测振幅的增加,且存在严重的诊断缺陷,我们认为双耳刺激不可取。