Suppr超能文献

单耳与双耳听觉刺激诱发的眼前庭诱发肌源性电位。

Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials elicited from monaural versus binaural acoustic stimulations.

作者信息

Wang Shou-Jen, Jaw Fu-Shan, Young Yi-Ho

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;120(2):420-3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.10.157. Epub 2008 Dec 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) that are elicited (recorded) in response to monaural and separately, simultaneous binaural acoustic stimulations. The optimal stimulation mode for oVEMPs was also determined.

METHODS

Twenty healthy volunteers (14 men and 6 women, aged from 22 to 33 years, mean 28 years) without any previous ear disorders were enrolled in this study. Each subject underwent oVEMP testing using monaural acoustic stimulation (Mon-oVEMP) with different stimulus intensities, and with bilateral recording. On another day, the same volunteers underwent oVEMP testing using simultaneous binaural acoustic stimulation and bilateral recording (Bin-oVEMP).

RESULTS

With 95 dB nHL tone burst stimulation, the biphasic nI-pI waveforms were recorded with maximal amplitudes from the electrodes located below the eyes contralateral to the side of acoustic stimulation while the subject was gazing upward. Significant correlations were identified between Mon-oVEMPs and Bin-oVEMPs with respect to threshold, latencies and amplitude. However, no significant difference existed between Mon-oVEMPs and Bin-oVEMPs in terms of the response rate, threshold, latency or amplitude.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bin-oVEMP test yields the same information as the Mon-oVEMP test, but the duration of recording in the former is shorter than the latter.

SIGNIFICANCE

The Bin-oVEMP test may be a more convenient screening tool for evaluating the crossed vestibulo-ocular reflex.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了单耳及分别同时双耳听觉刺激诱发(记录)的眼前庭诱发肌源性电位(oVEMP)。还确定了oVEMP的最佳刺激模式。

方法

招募20名无既往耳部疾病的健康志愿者(14名男性和6名女性,年龄22至33岁,平均28岁)。每位受试者接受不同刺激强度下单耳听觉刺激(单耳oVEMP)的oVEMP测试,并进行双侧记录。另一天,同一志愿者接受同时双耳听觉刺激和双侧记录的oVEMP测试(双耳oVEMP)。

结果

在95 dB nHL短纯音刺激下,当受试者向上凝视时,从听觉刺激侧对侧眼下方电极记录到双相nI-pI波形且振幅最大。单耳oVEMP和双耳oVEMP在阈值、潜伏期和振幅方面存在显著相关性。然而,单耳oVEMP和双耳oVEMP在反应率、阈值、潜伏期或振幅方面无显著差异。

结论

双耳oVEMP测试产生的信息与单耳oVEMP测试相同,但前者的记录时间比后者短。

意义

双耳oVEMP测试可能是评估交叉性前庭眼反射更方便的筛查工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验