Suppr超能文献

牙釉质发育不全人群口腔及全身表现的评估。

Evaluation of oral and systemic manifestations in an amelogenesis imperfecta population.

作者信息

Aren Gamze, Ozdemir Didem, Firatli Sonmez, Uygur Cem, Sepet Elif, Firatli Erhan

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, Istanbul 34 390, Turkey.

出版信息

J Dent. 2003 Nov;31(8):585-91. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00116-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this investigation was to describe the dental and craniofacial characteristics of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI).

METHODS

The study group included 43 patients(33 female and 10 male) with a mean age of 11.4+/-2.6 years. A panoramic and a cephalometric radiograph were obtained from each of these patients. Clinically AI cases were divided into four main groups according to Witkop. All patients were evaluated for chronological, bone and dental age. The patients who had severe retarded bone age were evaluated for plasma growth hormone(GH) concentrations.

RESULTS

Dental and bone ages were retarded with respect to chronological age in five patients. Dental maturity and tooth eruption were not age- appropriate in some of our patients. In type III AI patients a delay in skeletal age was observed. Severe late eruption was seen in 3 patients, severe delay in dental maturity was noted in patients with type IV AI. Dental age was clinically lower in GH-deficient subjects, and skeletal age was consistently more retarded than dental age when compared to chronological age. Anterior open bite was present in both primary and permanent dentitions of 50% of the patients with type I AI, 30.8% of the patients with type II AI, and 60% of type III AI.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that the primary structure for the classification of AI be based on the mode of inheritance, with the clinical and radiographic appearances (and any other features such as systemic findings) being the secondary discriminators.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述釉质发育不全(AI)患者的牙齿和颅面特征。

方法

研究组包括43例患者(33例女性和10例男性),平均年龄为11.4±2.6岁。对每位患者均拍摄了全景片和头颅侧位片。临床上,根据威特科普分类法将AI病例分为四个主要组。对所有患者的实际年龄、骨龄和牙龄进行评估。对骨龄严重滞后的患者检测血浆生长激素(GH)浓度。

结果

5例患者的牙龄和骨龄相对于实际年龄滞后。部分患者的牙齿成熟度和牙齿萌出与年龄不相符。III型AI患者观察到骨骼年龄延迟。3例患者出现严重的萌出延迟,IV型AI患者牙齿成熟严重延迟。生长激素缺乏患者的牙龄在临床上较低,与实际年龄相比,骨骼年龄始终比牙龄滞后更明显。I型AI患者50%的乳牙列和恒牙列、II型AI患者30.8%以及III型AI患者60%存在前牙开颌。

结论

得出结论,AI分类的主要依据应基于遗传方式,临床和影像学表现(以及任何其他特征,如全身检查结果)为次要鉴别因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验