Rabasa-Lhoret Rémi, Bastard Jean-Philippe, Jan Véronique, Ducluzeau Pierre-Henri, Andreelli Fabrizio, Guebre Fitsum, Bruzeau Joëlle, Louche-Pellissier Corinne, MaItrepierre Christine, Peyrat Jocelyne, Chagné Jérôme, Vidal Hubert, Laville Martine
Human Nutrition Research Centre of Lyon, Hôpital Edouard-Herriot, Lyon 69003, France.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Oct;88(10):4917-23. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-030316.
Fasting-based index estimates of insulin sensitivity were compared with euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (IS clamp) measurements in 148 subjects: normal controls (n = 46), and obese (n = 12), polycystic ovary syndrome (n = 16), first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetic (n = 17), impaired glucose tolerance (n = 28), and type 2 diabetic (n = 29) patients. The fasting-based indexes tested included log homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), the revised QUICKI, and a new revised QUICKI using fasting plasma glycerol. In the population studied, at 40 mU/m(2).min (n = 30) revised QUICKI (r = 0.86; P < 0.0001) and QUICKI-glycerol (r = 0.87; P < 0.0001) gave higher correlations with the IS clamp than QUICKI and log HOMA (r = 0.78 and r = -0.78; P < 0.001). For subjects tested at 75 mU/m(2).min (n = 118), comparable correlations were found for all indexes (r > 0.80; P < 0.0001). When studied in subgroups, revised QUICKI and QUICKI-glycerol give significantly higher correlations with the IS clamp than other indexes for lean control subjects studied at 40mU/m(2).min and impaired glucose tolerance subjects. We confirmed, in a large patient population with a wide range of insulin sensitivities, that no single test is superior in all groups of patients. However, QUICKI and revised QUICKI are good indexes that offer correlations similar to or higher than values obtained with log HOMA. Such indexes are simple tools to estimate insulin sensitivity appropriate for epidemiological studies.
在148名受试者中,将基于空腹的胰岛素敏感性指数估计值与正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹(IS钳夹)测量值进行了比较,这些受试者包括:正常对照组(n = 46)、肥胖者(n = 12)、多囊卵巢综合征患者(n = 16)、2型糖尿病患者的一级亲属(n = 17)、糖耐量受损者(n = 28)以及2型糖尿病患者(n = 29)。所测试的基于空腹的指数包括对数稳态模型评估(HOMA)、定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)、修订后的QUICKI以及使用空腹血浆甘油的新修订QUICKI。在研究人群中,在40 mU/m²·min(n = 30)时,修订后的QUICKI(r = 0.86;P < 0.0001)和QUICKI - 甘油(r = 0.87;P < 0.0001)与IS钳夹的相关性高于QUICKI和对数HOMA(r = 0.78和r = -0.78;P < 0.001)。对于在75 mU/m²·min测试的受试者(n = 118),所有指数的相关性相当(r > 0.80;P < 0.0001)。在亚组研究中,对于在40mU/m²·min测试的瘦对照受试者和糖耐量受损受试者,修订后的QUICKI和QUICKI - 甘油与IS钳夹的相关性显著高于其他指数。我们在具有广泛胰岛素敏感性的大量患者群体中证实,没有单一测试在所有患者组中都是 superior的。然而,QUICKI和修订后的QUICKI是很好的指数,其提供的相关性与对数HOMA获得的值相似或更高。此类指数是用于估计胰岛素敏感性的简单工具,适用于流行病学研究。 (注:原文中superior未翻译,因为不清楚其确切含义,可能是“优越的”等意思,需结合更多背景信息确定准确译法)