Molde Hagen Eli, Grasdal Astrid, Eriksen Hege R
Spine Clinic, Hedmark Central Hospital, 2312 Ottestad, Norway. emhagen@ online.no
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):2309-15; discussion 2316. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000085817.33211.3F.
A randomized clinical trial.
To evaluate long-term clinical and economical effects of a light mobilization program on the duration of sick leave for patients with subacute low back pain.
Twelve-month follow-up results from a previous study showed that early intervention with examination at a spine clinic, giving the patients information, reassurance, and encouragement to engage in physical activity as normal as possible had significant effect in reducing sick leave. At 12-month follow-up, 68.4% in the intervention group were off sick leave, as compared with 56.4% in the control group. Patients in this study were followed-up for a period of 3 years to investigate possible long-term effects.
Four hundred fifty-seven patients placed on a sick list for 8 to 12 weeks for low back pain were randomized into two groups: an intervention group (n = 237) and a control group (n = 220). The intervention group was examined at a spine clinic and given information and advice to stay active. The control group was not examined at the clinic but was treated within the primary health care.
Over the 3 years of observation, the intervention group had significantly fewer days of sickness compensation (average 125.7 d/person) than the control group (169.6 d/person). This difference is mainly caused by a more rapid return to work during the first year. There was no significant difference for the second or third year. In particular, there is no increased risk for reoccurrence of illness from early return to work. At 6-month follow-up, patients in the intervention group were less likely to use bed rest and more likely to use stretching and walking to cope with their back pain compared with the control group. This effect diminished. At 12-month follow-up, the only significant difference between the groups was in the use of stretching. Economic returns of the intervention were calculated in terms of increases in the net present value of production for the society because of the reduction in number of days on sick leave. Net benefits accumulated over 3 years of treating the 237 patients in the intervention group amount to approximately 2,822 dollars per person.
For patients with subacute low back pain, a brief and simple early intervention with examination, information, reassurance, and encouragement to engage in physical activity as normal as possible had economic gains for the society. The effect occurred during the first year after intervention. There were no significant long-term effects of the intervention. The initial gain obtained during the first year does not lead to any increased costs or increased risks for reoccurrence of illness over the next 2 years.
一项随机临床试验。
评估轻度活动计划对亚急性下背痛患者病假时长的长期临床和经济影响。
先前一项研究的12个月随访结果显示,在脊柱诊所进行早期干预并检查,向患者提供信息、安抚并鼓励其尽可能正常地进行体育活动,对减少病假有显著效果。在12个月随访时,干预组68.4%的患者已不再休病假,而对照组为56.4%。本研究中的患者随访了3年,以调查可能的长期影响。
457名因下背痛列入病假名单8至12周的患者被随机分为两组:干预组(n = 237)和对照组(n = 220)。干预组在脊柱诊所接受检查,并获得保持活动的信息和建议。对照组未在诊所接受检查,而是在初级卫生保健机构接受治疗。
在3年的观察期内,干预组的病假补偿天数(平均每人125.7天)显著少于对照组(每人169.6天)。这种差异主要是由于第一年更快地恢复工作。第二年和第三年没有显著差异。特别是,提前恢复工作不会增加疾病复发的风险。在6个月随访时,与对照组相比,干预组的患者较少卧床休息,更多地采用伸展和散步来应对背痛。这种效果逐渐减弱。在12个月随访时,两组之间唯一显著的差异在于伸展运动的使用。干预的经济回报通过因病假天数减少而给社会带来的生产净现值增加来计算。对干预组的237名患者进行3年治疗所积累的净收益约为每人2822美元。
对于亚急性下背痛患者,进行简短而简单的早期干预,包括检查、信息提供、安抚并鼓励其尽可能正常地进行体育活动,对社会有经济收益。这种效果在干预后的第一年出现。干预没有显著的长期影响。在第一年获得的初始收益在接下来的两年中不会导致任何成本增加或疾病复发风险增加。