Kupke Christian
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Charité Berlin.
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2003;105(6):749-61.
It is often said that there is an unbridgeable gap between phenomenology and psychoanalysis. But this is only half the truth. Starting from Merleau-Ponty's proposal of an objectivistic and an idealistic divergence of Freud's enterprise the paper tries to reconstruct two possible movements: the objectivistic divergence of Husserl's enterprise as a phenomenological shift towards psychoanalysis and the idealistic divergence of Freud's enterprise as a psychoanalytical shift towards phenomenology. It is shown that this approach is possible on the field of language and semiotics where psychic life, as the essence of our subjectivity, may be rendered as a uniform phenomenon of an articulation in the world of signs. This thesis is elucidated at the end of the paper by discussing first (to the phenomenological side) a certain interpretation of the use of Husserl's reduction as a method of investigation in psychiatry and second (to the psychoanalytic side) the importance of Lacan's difference between repression and foreclosure for a psychopathological understanding of psychosis.
人们常说现象学与精神分析之间存在着无法弥合的鸿沟。但这只说对了一半。本文从梅洛 - 庞蒂提出的弗洛伊德事业的客观主义和唯心主义分歧出发，试图重构两种可能的转向：胡塞尔事业的客观主义转向，即现象学向精神分析的转变；以及弗洛伊德事业的唯心主义转向，即精神分析向现象学的转变。研究表明，这种方法在语言和符号学领域是可行的，在该领域中，作为我们主体性本质的心理生活，可以被呈现为符号世界中一种表达的统一现象。本文结尾通过首先（从现象学角度）讨论对胡塞尔的还原法在精神病学研究中的某种解释，以及其次（从精神分析角度）讨论拉康的压抑与拒斥之间的差异对精神病的精神病理学理解的重要性，对这一论点进行了阐释。
