Aerts Peter, Van Damme Raoul, D'Août Kristiaan, Van Hooydonck Bieke
Department of Biology, University of Antwerp (UIA), Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 29;358(1437):1525-33. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1342.
This paper illustrates how simple mechanical models based on morphological, ethological, ecological and phylogenetic data can add to discussions in evolutionary biology. Bipedal locomotion has evolved on numerous occasions in lizards. Traits that appear repeatedly in independent evolutionary lines are often considered adaptive, but the exact advantages of bipedal locomotion in lizards remain debated. Earlier claims that bipedalism would increase maximal running speed or would be energetically advantageous have been questioned. Here, we use 'whole body' mechanical modelling to provide an alternative solution to the riddle. The starting point is the intermittent running style combined with the need for a high manoeuvrability characterizing many small lizard species. Manoeuvrability benefits from a caudal shift of the centre of mass of the body (body-COM), because forces to change the heading and to align the body to this new heading do not conflict with each other. The caudally situated body-COM, however, might result in a lift of the front part of the body when accelerating (intermittent style), thus resulting in bipedal running bouts. Based on a momentum-impulse approach the effect of acceleration is quantified for a mechanical model, a virtual lizard (three segments) based on the morphometrics of Acanthodactylus erythrurus (a small lacertid lizard). Biologically relevant input (dimensions, inertial properties, step cycle information, etc.) results in an important lift of the front part of the body and observable distances passively covered bipedally as a consequence of the acceleration. In this way, no functional explanation of the phenomenon of lizard bipedalism is required and bipedalism can probably be considered non-adaptive in many cases. This does not exclude, however, some species that may have turned this consequence to their benefit. For instance, instantaneous manipulation of the position of the centre of the body-COM allows stable, persisting bipedal running. Once this was achieved, the bipedal spandrel could be exploited further.
本文阐述了基于形态学、行为学、生态学和系统发育数据的简单力学模型如何为进化生物学的讨论增添内容。双足运动在蜥蜴中已多次进化。在独立进化谱系中反复出现的特征通常被认为具有适应性,但蜥蜴双足运动的确切优势仍存在争议。早期关于双足行走会提高最大奔跑速度或在能量上具有优势的说法已受到质疑。在此,我们使用“全身”力学建模为这个谜题提供另一种解决方案。出发点是许多小型蜥蜴物种所特有的间歇奔跑方式以及对高机动性的需求。机动性得益于身体重心(body - COM)向尾部的转移,因为改变方向和使身体与新方向对齐的力不会相互冲突。然而,位于尾部的身体重心在加速(间歇方式)时可能会导致身体前部抬起,从而产生双足奔跑阶段。基于动量 - 冲量方法,对一个基于红沙蜥(一种小型蜥蜴科蜥蜴)形态测量学的力学模型——虚拟蜥蜴(三段)的加速效果进行了量化。生物学相关输入(尺寸、惯性特性、步周期信息等)导致身体前部显著抬起,并由于加速而被动地产生可观的双足移动距离。通过这种方式,无需对蜥蜴双足运动现象进行功能解释,并且在许多情况下双足运动可能被认为是非适应性的。然而,这并不排除某些物种可能已将这种结果转化为自身优势。例如,对身体重心位置的即时操控可实现稳定、持续的双足奔跑。一旦实现这一点,双足附带现象就可以进一步被利用。