Kayl Anne E, Meyers Christina A
The University of Texas MD anderson Cancer Center, Department of Neuro-Oncology, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Neuro Oncol. 2003 Oct;5(4):255-60. doi: 10.1215/S1152851703000012.
This retrospective study investigated the relationship between tumor histology and postsurgical cognitive function in patients diagnosed with malignant brain tumors. The neuropsychological functioning of 24 adult patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was compared with the neuropsychological functioning of 24 adult patients diagnosed with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA). The groups were matched with respect to patient age, gender, and education, as well as tumor location and tumor volume. The mean raw test scores of the AA patient group were superior to the mean scores of the GBM patient group on nearly all measures administered. However, significant performance differences were not detected for any of 5 neuropsychological domain scores (Intellectual, Language, Memory, Executive, and Motor Function). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed that tumor histology was not a significant predictor of domain score after controlling for tumor volume. Multiple regression and correlation analyses supported the results of the ANCOVA by offering further evidence of weak relationships between tumor type, tumor volume, and neuropsychological test scores. We conclude that tumor histology is not clearly predictive of cognitive performance in adults with AA and GBM.
这项回顾性研究调查了被诊断为恶性脑肿瘤的患者的肿瘤组织学与术后认知功能之间的关系。将24例被诊断为多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的成年患者的神经心理功能与24例被诊断为间变性星形细胞瘤(AA)的成年患者的神经心理功能进行了比较。两组在患者年龄、性别、教育程度以及肿瘤位置和肿瘤体积方面进行了匹配。在几乎所有所实施的测量中,AA患者组的平均原始测试分数均优于GBM患者组的平均分数。然而,在5个神经心理领域分数(智力、语言、记忆、执行和运动功能)中的任何一个上均未检测到显著的表现差异。协方差分析(ANCOVA)显示,在控制肿瘤体积后,肿瘤组织学不是领域分数的显著预测因素。多元回归和相关分析通过提供肿瘤类型、肿瘤体积和神经心理测试分数之间弱关系的进一步证据,支持了ANCOVA的结果。我们得出结论,肿瘤组织学并不能明确预测患有AA和GBM的成年人的认知表现。